Re: New sources format

2016-12-21 Thread Mathieu Bridon
On Tue, 2016-12-20 at 23:30 +, Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 20/12/16 22:28, Christopher wrote: > > > > What's with the new sources format? > > The old format, I could do `md5sum -c sources` > > Why not make the new format with SHA512 follow the same pattern, so &g

Re: New sources format

2016-12-20 Thread Christopher
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 6:31 PM Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 20/12/16 22:28, Christopher wrote: > > What's with the new sources format? > > The old format, I could do `md5sum -c sources` > > Why not make the new format with SHA512 follow the same pattern, so I > cou

Re: New sources format

2016-12-20 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 20/12/16 22:28, Christopher wrote: > What's with the new sources format? > The old format, I could do `md5sum -c sources` > Why not make the new format with SHA512 follow the same pattern, so I could > do: `shasum -c sources` or `sha512sum -c sources`? > > Is there an

New sources format

2016-12-20 Thread Christopher
What's with the new sources format? The old format, I could do `md5sum -c sources` Why not make the new format with SHA512 follow the same pattern, so I could do: `shasum -c sources` or `sha512sum -c sources`? Is there any standard command-line tool to parse this new format, or do I just