Re: New libtiff version in rawhide, requires dependent packages rebuild

2012-05-11 Thread Pavel Alexeev
06.05.2012 20:10, Tom Lane wrote: I have pushed libtiff 4.0.1 into rawhide, replacing libtiff 3.9.5. This entails a library soname bump and a few small source-level incompatibilities, as detailed at http://www.remotesensing.org/libtiff/v4.0.0.html By my count there are about a hundred dependent

Re: New libtiff version in rawhide, requires dependent packages rebuild

2012-05-10 Thread Fabian Affolter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/06/2012 06:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > fab gipfel fab vifir Done Kind regard, Fabian -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk+

Re: New libtiff version in rawhide, requires dependent packages rebuild

2012-05-07 Thread Tom Callaway
On 05/06/2012 12:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > spotR > spotevas > spottkimg needs work for new libtiff > spotxloadimageneeds work for new libtiff These should all be done now in rawhide. ~tom == Fedora Project -- devel mailing list devel@li

Re: New libtiff version in rawhide, requires dependent packages rebuild

2012-05-07 Thread Tom Lane
Ralf Corsepius writes: > On 05/07/2012 10:08 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: >> On Mon, 07 May 2012 08:07:22 +0200, RC (Ralf) wrote: >>> Digging BZ, koji and googling did not turn up any formal FTBFS, however >>> when trying to rebuild OSG, it indeed fail to build due to an issue >>> which seems unrel

Re: New libtiff version in rawhide, requires dependent packages rebuild

2012-05-07 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 05/07/2012 10:08 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Mon, 07 May 2012 08:07:22 +0200, RC (Ralf) wrote: On 05/06/2012 06:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote: I have pushed libtiff 4.0.1 into rawhide, replacing libtiff 3.9.5. This entails a library soname bump and a few small source-level incompatibilities, as

Re: New libtiff version in rawhide, requires dependent packages rebuild

2012-05-07 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Mon, 07 May 2012 08:07:22 +0200, RC (Ralf) wrote: > On 05/06/2012 06:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > > I have pushed libtiff 4.0.1 into rawhide, replacing libtiff 3.9.5. > > This entails a library soname bump and a few small source-level > > incompatibilities, as detailed at > > http://www.remotesensi

Re: New libtiff version in rawhide, requires dependent packages rebuild

2012-05-07 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Sun, 2012-05-06 at 12:10 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > ankursinha aeskulap Rebuilt for rawhide and f17. -- Thanks :-), Regards, Ankur: "FranciscoD" http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha http://dodoincfedora.wordpress.com/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message

Re: New libtiff version in rawhide, requires dependent packages rebuild

2012-05-06 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 05/06/2012 06:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote: I have pushed libtiff 4.0.1 into rawhide, replacing libtiff 3.9.5. This entails a library soname bump and a few small source-level incompatibilities, as detailed at http://www.remotesensing.org/libtiff/v4.0.0.html By my count there are about a hundred depe

New libtiff version in rawhide, requires dependent packages rebuild

2012-05-06 Thread Tom Lane
I have pushed libtiff 4.0.1 into rawhide, replacing libtiff 3.9.5. This entails a library soname bump and a few small source-level incompatibilities, as detailed at http://www.remotesensing.org/libtiff/v4.0.0.html By my count there are about a hundred dependent packages (see list below), so to avo