On 17/03/13 11:17 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
In my experience, nearly all even somewhat mature apps need intltool to
compile, so it seems a reasonable thing to install by default in the
'development' group.
Only GNOME ones. :-)
The only file type it handles that's not GNOM
Adam Williamson wrote:
> In my experience, nearly all even somewhat mature apps need intltool to
> compile, so it seems a reasonable thing to install by default in the
> 'development' group.
Only GNOME ones. :-)
The only file type it handles that's not GNOME/GTK+-specific is .desktop
files, and
On 14/03/13 08:09 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
I haven't been able to find out yet because my rawhide machine is
broken but, intltool definitely needs to stay there.
Well, feel free to re-add it if you think that it is common tool that
developers regularly use. I don't share that thought but I certai
On 14. 3. 2013 at 04:58:51, Dan Mashal wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 4:56 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > On 14. 3. 2013 at 04:48:33, Dan Mashal wrote:
> >> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 1:46 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
> >> > Hi guys,
> >> > as per [1], I'd like to propose some patches for F19 comps. These
> >
On 14. 3. 2013 at 04:48:33, Dan Mashal wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 1:46 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> > as per [1], I'd like to propose some patches for F19 comps. These patches
> > are splitting group called Development Tools into several smaller groups.
> > The purpose of this email
On Thu, 2013-03-14 at 04:48 -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
>
> Please undo this change immediately and wait more than 2 days before
> you split such a massive group of important packages.
Maybe you could say what you find problematic with these changes instead
of this aggressive tone?
Pierre
--
devel
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 1:46 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
> Hi guys,
> as per [1], I'd like to propose some patches for F19 comps. These patches are
> splitting group called Development Tools into several smaller groups. The
> purpose of this email is to find out if there is something fundamentally wrong
On 12. 3. 2013 at 09:46:59, Jan Zelený wrote:
> Hi guys,
> as per [1], I'd like to propose some patches for F19 comps. These patches
> are splitting group called Development Tools into several smaller groups.
> The purpose of this email is to find out if there is something
> fundamentally wrong wit
Hi guys,
as per [1], I'd like to propose some patches for F19 comps. These patches are
splitting group called Development Tools into several smaller groups. The
purpose of this email is to find out if there is something fundamentally wrong
with the change (except for the fact that it is change).
