On 10/26/2011 05:27 PM, Tom Hughes wrote:
> Many CMS systems and the like work in that way. It's also what things
> like stackoverflow do, for example:
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7901782/war-does-not-start-on-tomcat5-on-redhat-enterprise-server
>
> where only the question number rea
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 07:17:10PM -0400, Luke Macken wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 03:04:12PM -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > Or perhaps even:
> > >
> > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA--N/package1-1.1.fc16,
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 03:04:12PM -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Or perhaps even:
> >
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA--N/package1-1.1.fc16,package2-1.1.fc16
> >
> > where anything after the FEDORA--N do
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Or perhaps even:
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA--N/package1-1.1.fc16,package2-1.1.fc16
>
> where anything after the FEDORA--N doesn't matter, but could
> contain all the current packages in the update.
This
Or perhaps even:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA--N/package1-1.1.fc16,package2-1.1.fc16
where anything after the FEDORA--N doesn't matter, but could
contain all the current packages in the update.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing
On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 13:45 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Really this is just a tooling question of whether it's overall more
> > convenient to have Bodhi use IDs and then implement convenience
> > scripts/tools wherever we refer to the updates which can identify them -
>
On 2011-10-25 15:17, Adam Williamson wrote:
> It's not just the updates-testing list, though. When I go to the web
> interface, search for updates to, say, grub2, get a list, and click on
> one of the results, I get an ID-based URL, not a package name-based one.
> I then paste that into an email, I
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> If an update has the n-e-v-r changed, the n-e-v-r being replaced is not
> likely to ever be used in a different future update. So each update could
> maintain a list of all n-e-v-r's that have ever been associated with it.
> Then make bodhi support URLs for all n-e-v-r's
On 26/10/11 12:45, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Maybe we could do what some sites like kde-apps.org do and default to URLs
> which include BOTH the ID and the packagename-version list, but have Bodhi
> only actually use the ID and ignore the packagename-version entirely.
>
> See e.g.:
> http://kde-apps.o
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Really this is just a tooling question of whether it's overall more
> convenient to have Bodhi use IDs and then implement convenience
> scripts/tools wherever we refer to the updates which can identify them -
> like a bot in IRC, and a modification to the updates-testing em
Adam Williamson wrote:
> In case you hadn't noticed, response to this has so far been pretty
> negative. It seems people liked being able to tell from the URL what the
> update actually *was*. I must admit I do to. I've resorted to creating
> the 'old-style' URLs manually when I do lists of updates
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 06:26:13PM -0400, Luke Macken wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 02:59:51PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 17:18 -0400, Luke Macken wrote:
> > > bodhi v0.8.3
> > >
> > >
> > > Yesterday I pushed out a new bugfix release of bodhi into prod
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 20:30 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > In case you hadn't noticed, response to this has so far been pretty
> > negative.
>
> Coming from someone (me) who often does updates involving > 1 pkg that
> sometimes require removing/adding components after initial submission, I
> very
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 17:18 -0400, Luke Macken wrote:
>> bodhi v0.8.3
>>
>>
>> Yesterday I pushed out a new bugfix release of bodhi into production. The
>> bodhi-client is currently on it's way to updates-testing for all
>> releases.
>
>> Server fixes
>> ---
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 19:03 -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
> > Think about how bugzilla bugs are handled in IRC. Bugs all have ID
> > numbers. Why should updates be different? I vote for static IDs because
> > I have run into the case of modified updates and broken URLs.
>
> > Adam, can you not pursu
On Tuesday, October 25, 2011, 6:32:26 PM, Michael wrote:
> Luke Macken wrote:
>>> In case you hadn't noticed, response to this has so far been pretty
>>> > negative. It seems people liked being able to tell from the URL what the
>>> > update actually*was*. I must admit I do to. I've resorted to c
Luke Macken wrote:
>> In case you hadn't noticed, response to this has so far been pretty
>> > negative. It seems people liked being able to tell from the URL what the
>> > update actually*was*. I must admit I do to. I've resorted to creating
>> > the 'old-style' URLs manually when I do lists of
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 02:59:51PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 17:18 -0400, Luke Macken wrote:
> > bodhi v0.8.3
> >
> >
> > Yesterday I pushed out a new bugfix release of bodhi into production. The
> > bodhi-client is currently on it's way to updates-testing
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 16:10 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:59:51 -0700
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 17:18 -0400, Luke Macken wrote:
> > > bodhi v0.8.3
> > >
> > >
> > > Yesterday I pushed out a new bugfix release of bodhi into
> > > produc
On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:59:51 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 17:18 -0400, Luke Macken wrote:
> > bodhi v0.8.3
> >
> >
> > Yesterday I pushed out a new bugfix release of bodhi into
> > production. The bodhi-client is currently on it's way to
> > updates-testing f
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 14:59 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I must admit I do to.
Oh, good lord. Excuse me while I shoot myself.
(that was a typo, not just idiocy. But still.)
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.hap
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 17:18 -0400, Luke Macken wrote:
> bodhi v0.8.3
>
>
> Yesterday I pushed out a new bugfix release of bodhi into production. The
> bodhi-client is currently on it's way to updates-testing for all releases.
> Server fixes
>
>
> - Default to update ID-
bodhi v0.8.3
Yesterday I pushed out a new bugfix release of bodhi into production. The
bodhi-client is currently on it's way to updates-testing for all releases.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates
I raced to get this out before the infrastructure freeze today, and since the
23 matches
Mail list logo
