Re: New ETL version needed for synfig update

2012-02-14 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > On Mon 13 Feb 2012 04:55:03 AM PST, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> >> >> Have you filed a bug against that package to alert the maintainer? >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com >> >> If not, that would be a great first step. >> > > Done. https://bugzilla

Re: New ETL version needed for synfig update

2012-02-13 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
On Mon 13 Feb 2012 04:55:03 AM PST, Jon Ciesla wrote: Have you filed a bug against that package to alert the maintainer? https://bugzilla.redhat.com If not, that would be a great first step. Done. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790249 I found out Lubomir is the maintainer. I co

Re: New ETL version needed for synfig update

2012-02-13 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:35 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > Hello, > > Upstream synfig has updated ETL to  0.04.14. The new version of synfig and > synfigstudio depend on the recent update of that package. Is it possible to > update it? Have you filed a bug against that package to alert the main

New ETL version needed for synfig update

2012-02-12 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
Hello, Upstream synfig has updated ETL to 0.04.14. The new version of synfig and synfigstudio depend on the recent update of that package. Is it possible to update it? Regards, -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic& Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.thefinalzone.net -- devel ma