On 4/13/2010 14:07, James Laska wrote:
> I see, thanks for the clarification. Is there a better way you would
> recommend to locate a sponsor for the packager of beakerlib (pmuller)?
Before anyone will sponsor a prospective packager the person should
first do some informal package reviews to dem
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 13:58 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "JL" == James Laska writes:
>
> JL> I take it from your response that you're not interested in reviewing
> JL> and sponsoring this package review request?
>
> Again, we don't sponsor packages or package review requests. We s
> "JL" == James Laska writes:
JL> I take it from your response that you're not interested in reviewing
JL> and sponsoring this package review request?
Again, we don't sponsor packages or package review requests. We sponsor
packagers. Packagers need to demonstrate various things before some
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 12:55 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "AW" == Adam Williamson writes:
>
> AW> I think it was just a thinko for 'review'.
>
> In which case, why would a sponsor be required at all? James is in the
> packager group, so he could just do the review. According to th
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 12:55 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "AW" == Adam Williamson writes:
>
> AW> I think it was just a thinko for 'review'.
>
> In which case, why would a sponsor be required at all? James is in the
> packager group, so he could just do the review.
> According to
> "AW" == Adam Williamson writes:
AW> I think it was just a thinko for 'review'.
In which case, why would a sponsor be required at all? James is in the
packager group, so he could just do the review. According to the ticket
in question, a sponsor for the packager is required (FE-NEEDSPONSO
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 12:33 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "JL" == James Laska writes:
>
> JL> Greetings folks, Is anyone interested in sponsoring a new package
> JL> used in several upcoming AutoQA test cases?
>
> We don't sponsor packages, we sponsor packagers. Has the packager i
> "JL" == James Laska writes:
JL> Greetings folks, Is anyone interested in sponsoring a new package
JL> used in several upcoming AutoQA test cases?
We don't sponsor packages, we sponsor packagers. Has the packager in
question done any other review work? Submitted other packages for
inspec
Greetings folks,
Is anyone interested in sponsoring a new package used in several
upcoming AutoQA test cases? The package is beakerlib (a shell-level
integration testing library), and the review request can be found at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561470.
I've done my best to he
