On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 05:45:15PM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> >
> > In principle all fixes should be upstreamed, but this is a trivial
> > packaging change that can be easily and safely done just in
> > Fedora.
> >
Hi
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> In principle all fixes should be upstreamed, but this is a trivial
> packaging change that can be easily and safely done just in
> Fedora.
>
Agreed but also note that even packages that install to the recommended
location
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 09:32:08PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 1:57 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On a side note, that's the legacy location for bash completion
> >> snippets. The modern one
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 1:57 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
>
>>
>> On a side note, that's the legacy location for bash completion
>> snippets. The modern one from which they're loaded on demand is:
>> $ pkg-config --variable=completionsdi
Hi
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On a side note, that's the legacy location for bash completion
> snippets. The modern one from which they're loaded on demand is:
> $ pkg-config --variable=completionsdir bash-completion
> More info in /usr/share/doc/bash-completion/READM
Hi
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Till Maas < wrote:
> sundaram cowsay
>
Fixed directory ownership and bash completion script location using
pkg-config as suggested by Ville.FWIW, packaging guidelines has an
example using the old location which should be fixed. Thanks
Rahul
--
devel mail
2014-09-24 22:50 GMT+02:00 Michael Schwendt :
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership
>
> | Packages must own all directories they put files in, except for:
> |
> | any directories owned by the filesystem, man, or other explicitly
> | created -
On 24/09/14 21:36, Till Maas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that mulitple packages own /etc/bash_completion.d/ even though
> it is nowadays part of the filesystem package. From what I read from the
> Guidelines, it is not clear to me whether it is prohibited or not.
> Should it be fixed? Here is a cur
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> I noticed that mulitple packages own /etc/bash_completion.d/ [...]
On a side note, that's the legacy location for bash completion
snippets. The modern one from which they're loaded on demand is:
$ pkg-config --variable=completionsdir bash-comp
On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 21:36:15 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that mulitple packages own /etc/bash_completion.d/ even though
> it is nowadays part of the filesystem package. From what I read from the
> Guidelines, it is not clear to me whether it is prohibited or not.
https://fedorapr
Hi,
I noticed that mulitple packages own /etc/bash_completion.d/ even though
it is nowadays part of the filesystem package. From what I read from the
Guidelines, it is not clear to me whether it is prohibited or not.
Should it be fixed? Here is a current list for Fedora 19:
repoquery --whatprovid
11 matches
Mail list logo
