On Tuesday, 20 June 2023 at 00:01, JT wrote:
> In the original post, I took private to mean its own dedicated list...
> not that it'd be hidden from view from everyone. IMHO everything with
> Fedora should be in the open. Bugs should be reported upstream, so I
> dont see why there would need to b
itical mass
of
packages and maintainers that warrants the creation of a Multimedia
SIG.
I propose, similar to the recently established LibreOffice SIG, to
create a FAS group, Bugzilla account and a private mailing list.
Great idea!
P.
--
Philip Rhoades
PO Box 896
Cowra NSW 2794
Austr
On Mon, 2023-06-19 at 18:01 -0400, JT wrote:
> In the original post, I took private to mean its own dedicated list... not
> that it'd be hidden
> from view from everyone. IMHO everything with Fedora should be in the open.
> Bugs should be
> reported upstream, so I dont see why there would need
packages in Fedora, mostly owing
> > > to the introduction of ffmpeg package and Legal permission to enable
> > > and ship many popular codecs, I think we've reached the critical mass of
> > > packages and maintainers that warrants the creation of a Multimedia SIG.
&
ackage and Legal permission to enable
> > and ship many popular codecs, I think we've reached the critical mass of
> > packages and maintainers that warrants the creation of a Multimedia SIG.
> >
> > I propose, similar to the recently established LibreOffice SIG, to
&
In the original post, I took private to mean its own dedicated list... not
that it'd be hidden from view from everyone. IMHO everything with Fedora
should be in the open. Bugs should be reported upstream, so I dont see why
there would need to be any confidential information dealt with by the SIG.
On Mon, 2023-06-19 at 23:39 +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * Philip Wyett [19/06/2023 22:20] :
> > Private mailing list? No part of this project should have private anything
> > IMHO.
>
> Bug reports can explain security flaws and lead to exploits. They can
> also contain confidentiel informatio
* Philip Wyett [19/06/2023 22:20] :
>
> Private mailing list? No part of this project should have private anything
> IMHO.
Bug reports can explain security flaws and lead to exploits. They can
also contain confidentiel information.
I would suggest a private ml dedicated to bugs and a public one
e've reached the critical mass of
> packages and maintainers that warrants the creation of a Multimedia SIG.
>
> I propose, similar to the recently established LibreOffice SIG, to
> create a FAS group, Bugzilla account and a private mailing list.
>
Private mailing list? No part
he introduction of ffmpeg package and Legal permission to enable
> and ship many popular codecs, I think we've reached the critical mass of
> packages and maintainers that warrants the creation of a Multimedia SIG.
>
> I propose, similar to the recently established LibreOffice SI
Hello!
With the growing number of multimedia packages in Fedora, mostly owing
to the introduction of ffmpeg package and Legal permission to enable
and ship many popular codecs, I think we've reached the critical mass of
packages and maintainers that warrants the creation of a Multimedia SI
On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 14:44 -0500, Trever Fischer wrote:
> Greetings from FUDCon, in Blacksburg, VA.
>
> I know that only a handful of people might recognize me on devel@, but
> something that's been rolling around in my head for a little while is to
> start a Multimedia S
Greetings from FUDCon, in Blacksburg, VA.
I know that only a handful of people might recognize me on devel@, but
something that's been rolling around in my head for a little while is to
start a Multimedia SIG in fedora.
I know there exists the audio and music SIGs, but they focus more to
13 matches
Mail list logo
