Re: Moving libcrypto.so.* back to /lib

2010-04-10 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 10:17:25AM +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote: > So I got convinced that libcrypto.so.* should be moved back to /lib in > the https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559953 The libssl.so.* > will stay in /usr/lib though. > > I will do that change in F14 packages. Till Maas asked m

Re: Moving libcrypto.so.* back to /lib

2010-04-09 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 01:42:54PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 17:54 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 10:26:01AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > > > Depending on fixed paths seems like a bad idea. > > > > It depends on fixed paths because fixed paths

Re: Moving libcrypto.so.* back to /lib

2010-04-09 Thread Adam Jackson
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 17:54 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 10:26:01AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > > Depending on fixed paths seems like a bad idea. > > It depends on fixed paths because fixed paths are used to build the > appliance. Therefore the dependencies tell us w

Re: Moving libcrypto.so.* back to /lib

2010-04-09 Thread Chuck Anderson
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 10:17:25AM +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote: > So I got convinced that libcrypto.so.* should be moved back to /lib in > the https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559953 The libssl.so.* > will stay in /usr/lib though. > > I will do that change in F14 packages. Till Maas asked m

Re: Moving libcrypto.so.* back to /lib

2010-04-09 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Richard W.M. Jones said: > On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 10:26:01AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > > Once upon a time, Richard W.M. Jones said: > > > libguestfs builds its appliance on the fly by concatenating together > > > files [library files, binaries and data files] from the host.

Re: Moving libcrypto.so.* back to /lib

2010-04-09 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 10:26:01AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Richard W.M. Jones said: > > libguestfs builds its appliance on the fly by concatenating together > > files [library files, binaries and data files] from the host. We > > express this requirement by mapping the locat

Re: Moving libcrypto.so.* back to /lib

2010-04-09 Thread Till Maas
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 04:21:53PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 10:17:25AM +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote: > > So I got convinced that libcrypto.so.* should be moved back to /lib in > > the https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559953 The libssl.so.* > > will stay in /u

Re: Moving libcrypto.so.* back to /lib

2010-04-09 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Richard W.M. Jones said: > libguestfs builds its appliance on the fly by concatenating together > files [library files, binaries and data files] from the host. We > express this requirement by mapping the location of those files into > dependencies. Why can't it just depend on

Re: Moving libcrypto.so.* back to /lib

2010-04-09 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 10:17:25AM +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote: > So I got convinced that libcrypto.so.* should be moved back to /lib in > the https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559953 The libssl.so.* > will stay in /usr/lib though. > > I will do that change in F14 packages. Till Maas asked m

Re: Moving libcrypto.so.* back to /lib

2010-04-09 Thread Adam Jackson
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 10:17 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote: > So I got convinced that libcrypto.so.* should be moved back to /lib in > the https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559953 The libssl.so.* > will stay in /usr/lib though. > > I will do that change in F14 packages. Till Maas asked me for t

Moving libcrypto.so.* back to /lib

2010-04-09 Thread Tomas Mraz
So I got convinced that libcrypto.so.* should be moved back to /lib in the https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559953 The libssl.so.* will stay in /usr/lib though. I will do that change in F14 packages. Till Maas asked me for this change also in F13, but I am a little hesitant to do this a