Hello,
Le 07/03/2010 20:42, Ville Skyttä a écrit :
>> If I change the path in conf.d/BackupPC.conf ; users who have modified
>> the .conf file will get a conf.rpmnew file ; that's fine.
>>
> If apache.users moves from /usr/share/BackupPC to /etc/BackupPC, it'll break
> these setups because t
On Sun, 2010-03-07 at 17:55 +0100, Johan Cwiklinski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a small question regarding a "configuration file" for BackupPC.
>
> BackupPC requires a file for apache users. This file is referenced in
> /etc/httpd/conf.d/BackupPC.conf and points to
> /usr/share/BackupPC/apache.use
On Sunday 07 March 2010, Johan Cwiklinski wrote:
Not that I know anything about BackupPC, but:
> If I change the path in conf.d/BackupPC.conf ; users who have modified
> the .conf file will get a conf.rpmnew file ; that's fine.
If apache.users moves from /usr/share/BackupPC to /etc/BackupPC, it'
On Sunday 07 March 2010 11:55:11 am Johan Cwiklinski wrote:
> If I change the path in conf.d/BackupPC.conf ; users who have modified
> the .conf file will get a conf.rpmnew file ; that's fine.
> The ones who did not change the .conf file will have it replaced by RPM,
> breaking the apache authentic
Hello,
I have a small question regarding a "configuration file" for BackupPC.
BackupPC requires a file for apache users. This file is referenced in
/etc/httpd/conf.d/BackupPC.conf and points to
/usr/share/BackupPC/apache.users.
I think that is a mistake, and such a file should better be placed i
