On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 6:44 AM, Paul Johnson
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I'd like to see the contents of the package moved around so that when
>> I install something like banshee I don't need to install mono-devel
>> and have it pull in all the dev packages that I don't need on a
>> netbook that I never use
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Paul Johnson
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm just in the process of a final package for mono-2.10.1 and would like to
> garner some opinions before the final spin.
>
> Currently, there is a mono-4-preview sub-package which is an optional extra.
> The .NET 4 stuff is pretty sta
Hi,
On 7 March 2011 22:18, Chris Smart wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Paul Johnson
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm just in the process of a final package for mono-2.10.1 and would like
> to
> > garner some opinions before the final spin.
> >
>
> Was Mono ever split into the ECMA and non-
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Paul Johnson
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm just in the process of a final package for mono-2.10.1 and would like to
> garner some opinions before the final spin.
>
Was Mono ever split into the ECMA and non-ECMA components, as Miguel promised?
-c
--
devel mailing list
deve
Hi,
I'm just in the process of a final package for mono-2.10.1 and would like to
garner some opinions before the final spin.
Currently, there is a mono-4-preview sub-package which is an optional extra.
The .NET 4 stuff is pretty stable now and I'm thinking of retiring the
sub-package and adding t
