Re: Minimal install option (was Re: Services that can start by default policy feedback)

2011-02-28 Thread Larry Vaden
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 3:21 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Larry Vaden writes: > >>>From a recent default install of F14: >> >> ps auxw | wc -l >> 124 > > How many of those are kernel threads? I dunno but if you will suggest a mod to the CLI command I'll run it and report back. regards/va...@texo

Re: Minimal install option (was Re: Services that can start by default policy feedback)

2011-02-28 Thread Andreas Schwab
Larry Vaden writes: >>From a recent default install of F14: > > ps auxw | wc -l > 124 How many of those are kernel threads? Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E "And now for something completely different." --

Re: Minimal install option (was Re: Services that can start by default policy feedback)

2011-02-27 Thread Ian Pilcher
On 02/25/2011 03:07 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > Heh, have we started getting bug reports about it not being minimal > enough or it being too minimal yet? Do you want them? ;-) -- Ian Pilcher

Re: Minimal install option (was Re: Services that can start by default policy feedback)

2011-02-27 Thread Larry Vaden
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > > If it includes sendmail its not minimal enough ;-) >From a recent default install of F14: ps auxw | wc -l 124 Several of the BSDish distros achieve 30-50 as a minimal install. e.g., on RHEL. IMHO some thought should be given to the sec

Re: Minimal install option (was Re: Services that can start by default policy feedback)

2011-02-27 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > On 2/25/11 12:51 PM, Chris Lumens wrote: This was the same realization that led to the removal of the labeled "minimal" install, too many people just wanted to argue over the meaning of the term "minimal". >>> >>> ? There's sti

Re: Minimal install option (was Re: Services that can start by default policy feedback)

2011-02-25 Thread Jesse Keating
On 2/25/11 12:51 PM, Chris Lumens wrote: >>> This was the same realization that >>> led to the removal of the labeled "minimal" install, too many people >>> just wanted to argue over the meaning of the term "minimal". >> >> ? There's still a 'minimal' radio button in the installer at the package >>

Re: Minimal install option (was Re: Services that can start by default policy feedback)

2011-02-25 Thread Chris Lumens
> > This was the same realization that > > led to the removal of the labeled "minimal" install, too many people > > just wanted to argue over the meaning of the term "minimal". > > ? There's still a 'minimal' radio button in the installer at the package > set selection stage. I know, I just cli

Re: Minimal install option (was Re: Services that can start by default policy feedback)

2011-02-25 Thread MichaƂ Piotrowski
2011/2/25 Adam Williamson : > On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 09:53 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: >> This was the same realization that >> led to the removal of the labeled "minimal" install, too many people >> just wanted to argue over the meaning of the term "minimal". > > ? There's still a 'minimal' radio b

Minimal install option (was Re: Services that can start by default policy feedback)

2011-02-25 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 09:53 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > This was the same realization that > led to the removal of the labeled "minimal" install, too many people > just wanted to argue over the meaning of the term "minimal". ? There's still a 'minimal' radio button in the installer at the pac