Re: Mass deduplication and reassignment of ABRT bugs

2012-03-21 Thread Nikola Pajkovsky
Michael Cronenworth writes: > Miroslav Lichvar wrote: >> We don't try to deduplicate python bugs yet. (only by the abrt_hash >> field in bugzilla) > > Every dupe bug has the same abrt_hash in the Whiteboard: > abrt_hash:01acb9e5787833cdbc03832f71e787ef531f1cd which is very, very odd. what we fir

Re: Mass deduplication and reassignment of ABRT bugs

2012-03-21 Thread Jiri Moskovcak
On 03/21/2012 02:32 PM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 08:08:13AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Miroslav Lichvar wrote: We don't try to deduplicate python bugs yet. (only by the abrt_hash field in bugzilla) Every dupe bug has the same abrt_hash in the Whiteboard: abrt_has

Re: Mass deduplication and reassignment of ABRT bugs

2012-03-21 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 08:08:13AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > >We don't try to deduplicate python bugs yet. (only by the abrt_hash > >field in bugzilla) > > Every dupe bug has the same abrt_hash in the Whiteboard: > abrt_hash:01acb9e5787833cdbc03832f71e787ef531f1

Re: Mass deduplication and reassignment of ABRT bugs

2012-03-21 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Miroslav Lichvar wrote: We don't try to deduplicate python bugs yet. (only by the abrt_hash field in bugzilla) Every dupe bug has the same abrt_hash in the Whiteboard: abrt_hash:01acb9e5787833cdbc03832f71e787ef531f1cd -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproje

Re: Mass deduplication and reassignment of ABRT bugs

2012-03-21 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 02:56:40PM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > >If you find a suspicious action, please let us know at > >crash-catc...@lists.fedorahosted.org or file a ticket at > >https://fedorahosted.org/abrt. > > What about bugs that your script did not catch

Re: Mass deduplication and reassignment of ABRT bugs

2012-03-21 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 08:58:36PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > Here's another suspicious action: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/714364#3 > > Is anybody from the ABRT team watching these actions? > The bot closed bug 714364 (gtk2) as duplicate of bug 701926 > (rhythmbox) and did the same

Re: Mass deduplication and reassignment of ABRT bugs

2012-03-20 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:35:19 +0100, ML (Miroslav) wrote: > If you find a suspicious action, please let us know at > crash-catc...@lists.fedorahosted.org or file a ticket at > https://fedorahosted.org/abrt. That list requires a subscription, so my earlier message had bounced. Here's another susp

Re: Mass deduplication and reassignment of ABRT bugs

2012-03-20 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Miroslav Lichvar wrote: If you find a suspicious action, please let us know at crash-catc...@lists.fedorahosted.org or file a ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/abrt. What about bugs that your script did not catch? Bug 752238[1] has about 100 dupes against it that I just wore out after a han

Re: Mass deduplication and reassignment of ABRT bugs

2012-03-20 Thread Michael Schwendt
> If you find a suspicious action, please let us know at > crash-catc...@lists.fedorahosted.org or file a ticket at > https://fedorahosted.org/abrt. > > [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ABRTBacktraceDeduplication > Well, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/698426#c5 | Backtrace analysis foun

Mass deduplication and reassignment of ABRT bugs

2012-03-16 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
As a part of the ABRT Backtrace Deduplication Service[1], we are planning to close and reassign old ABRT bugs in bugzilla. Bugs which were found to have similar backtraces will be closed as duplicates of the bug with most CCed users. If the bugs originate from different components and their backtra