On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 11:29:59AM -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> That being said, there are certainly false positives here, due to my
> somewhat buggy script and the fact that I'm using data that's a bit
> stale. Is there a better way to download all the spec files than to
> grab them one at
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 16:59 -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>> Hi everyone-
>>
>> This is a notice in accordance with the mass bug filing procedure.
>>
>> A number of packages install systemd units and enable them
>> automatically. They sh
On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 16:59 -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> Hi everyone-
>
> This is a notice in accordance with the mass bug filing procedure.
>
> A number of packages install systemd units and enable them
> automatically. They should not. Please update these packages to use the
> macroized
On 04/30/14 at 09:02am, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> Due to some confusion around how alternatives worked, I screwed up the
> list of packages here. I've updated it below. I'll give it a few
> more days before filing the actual bugs.
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 09:02:30AM -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> Due to some confusion around how alternatives worked, I screwed up the
> list of packages here. I've updated it below. I'll give it a few
> more days before filing the actual bugs.
> abrt
> acpid
> aeolus-audrey-agent
> aeolus-c
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
spacenavd
>>> Right or wrong, the decis
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>>> spacenavd
>>>
>>> Right or wrong, the decision for enabling spacenavd by default is that
>> you would only inst
Hi
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>
>> spacenavd
>>
>> Right or wrong, the decision for enabling spacenavd by default is that
> you would only install the package if you have one of these devices.
> Nothing should
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> spacenavd
>
> Right or wrong, the decision for enabling spacenavd by default is that you
would only install the package if you have one of these devices. Nothing
should be pulling it in so it needs to be explicitly installed by the user
Due to some confusion around how alternatives worked, I screwed up the
list of packages here. I've updated it below. I'll give it a few
more days before filing the actual bugs.
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> Hi everyone-
>
> This is a notice in accordance with the m
Hi everyone-
This is a notice in accordance with the mass bug filing procedure.
A number of packages install systemd units and enable them
automatically. They should not. Please update these packages to use the
macroized scriptlet
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Syst
11 matches
Mail list logo
