Benny Amorsen writes:
> Do any of you use _. to match e.g. the h extension?
>
> Right now _[a-z] does not match the special h extension but does match
> someone explicitly dialling "h". Would it make sense to extend this
> behaviour to the . and ! patterns, so they never match h?
>
>
> /Benny
I
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Benny Amorsen wrote:
> Do any of you use _. to match e.g. the h extension?
>
> Right now _[a-z] does not match the special h extension but does match
> someone explicitly dialling "h". Would it make sense to extend this
> behaviour to the . and ! patterns, so they
Do any of you use _. to match e.g. the h extension?
Right now _[a-z] does not match the special h extension but does match
someone explicitly dialling "h". Would it make sense to extend this
behaviour to the . and ! patterns, so they never match h?
/Benny
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fed
