On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 2:08 PM Jerry James wrote:
> An update of mpfr from version 3.1.6 to version 4.0.2 is about to begin in
> Rawhide in a side tag:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/mpfr-4.0.2
>
> If you see a "Rebuild for mpfr 4" commit in yo
An update of mpfr from version 3.1.6 to version 4.0.2 is about to begin in
Rawhide in a side tag:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/mpfr-4.0.2
If you see a "Rebuild for mpfr 4" commit in your package repo, then please
coordinate with me before building your package in Rawhid
I second this notion. As I recall, the only thing in the way of the
MPFR 4 update was a circular dependency on the libmpc package I
maintain, and allowing the userbase to catch up to the API change.
It's been a while now, and it would be nice to get this change rolling.
--
James Paul T
r if he is too busy to pay attention to mpfr. Thank you.
>
> Hi, sorry for the delayed reply. I will not be able to look into it
> before Monday.
[Nearly 2 months later]
I need some advice on how to proceed. I am ready to move the mpfr 4
change forward, but the 2 lines above are the on
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:31:02AM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 9:07 AM Jerry James wrote:
> > I'm down to these 3 still to go: arm-none-eabi-gcc-cs, avr-gcc, and
> > cross-gcc. Those gcc builds take a long time. :-) So far the builds
> > have gone smoothly.
>
> All the b
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 9:07 AM Jerry James wrote:
> I'm down to these 3 still to go: arm-none-eabi-gcc-cs, avr-gcc, and
> cross-gcc. Those gcc builds take a long time. :-) So far the builds
> have gone smoothly.
All the builds have completed without trouble. I did have to patch a
couple of pa
On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 4:17 AM James Paul Turner
wrote:
> Nice work Jerry!
>
> I remember it being quite difficult to get into contact with Pavel last
> time I tried. I eventually had to use the non-responsive maintainer
> procedure.
I hope that is not necessary, but in case it is, here is a req
27;ve
> > still got 6 to go, and so far I've only hit 2 issues, neither of
> > them
> > related to MPFR. Unless something comes up with these last few, I
> > think we need the MPFR 3 and MPC-linked-with-MPFR-3 compatibility
> > packages only to get gcc switched
of them
> related to MPFR. Unless something comes up with these last few, I
> think we need the MPFR 3 and MPC-linked-with-MPFR-3 compatibility
> packages only to get gcc switched over, then we can discard them and
> have an entirely MPFR 4 distribution.
I'm down to these 3 still
MPFR. Unless something comes up with these last few, I
think we need the MPFR 3 and MPC-linked-with-MPFR-3 compatibility
packages only to get gcc switched over, then we can discard them and
have an entirely MPFR 4 distribution.
In fact, I know that one of the remaining 6, sagemath, won't be a
s have libmpc-mpfr3.so* and /usr/include/mpc-mpfr3.h.
> - Build gcc with mpfr3 and libmpc-mpfr3. This means that gcc no
> longer depends
> on the mpfr and libmpc packages, so we can change them without
> breaking gcc.
> We will have to patch gcc to use the mpfr3 header file name
Build libmpc again. Now libmpc-mpfr3 is linked with mpfr3 and libmpc is
linked with mpfr.
- Build gcc with mpfr and libmpc. We just drop the patch we used two steps ago
and rebuild. Now gcc works with the new packages, and packages that use mpfr
can be upgraded to mpfr4 at their leisure (but w
On Sat, Jul 06, 2019 at 07:51:48PM +0100, James Paul Turner wrote:
> I should be more specific. By 'this' I mean packaging a library which
> already exists in Fedora, but is of lower version.
There is no way around having some compatibility version, either in the same
or other rpm, at least for a
On Sat, 2019-07-06 at 19:47 +0100, James Paul Turner wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-07-01 at 21:55 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> > Is anything happening with introducing MPFR 4 into Fedora? I found
> > these:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/mpfr-4.0.0
>
On Mon, 2019-07-01 at 21:55 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> Is anything happening with introducing MPFR 4 into Fedora? I found
> these:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/mpfr-4.0.0
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537252
>
> but they indicate that effort
Is anything happening with introducing MPFR 4 into Fedora? I found these:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/mpfr-4.0.0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537252
but they indicate that efforts to update have come to a halt. I ask
because I have had to patch 2 of my packages to
16 matches
Mail list logo
