On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> I tried rebuild RPM on F-14. New RPM doesn't find all provides as it should.
>>> Example:
>>> RPM 4.9.alpha
>>> rpm -qp --provides perl-CGI-3.50
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I tried rebuild RPM on F-14. New RPM doesn't find all provides as it should.
>> Example:
>> RPM 4.9.alpha
>> rpm -qp --provides perl-CGI-3.50-1.fc14.noarch.rpm
>> perl-CGI = 3.50-1.fc14
>>
>> RP
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Erik van Pienbroek wrote:
> Panu Matilainen schreef op di 30-11-2010 om 22:10 [+0200]:
>> On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Erik van Pienbroek wrote:
>>> If I understand your blog entry correctly then we (the Fedora MinGW SIG)
>>> are recommended to use something like this:
>>>
>>> %__ming
Panu Matilainen schreef op di 30-11-2010 om 22:10 [+0200]:
> On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Erik van Pienbroek wrote:
> > If I understand your blog entry correctly then we (the Fedora MinGW SIG)
> > are recommended to use something like this:
> >
> > %__mingw32_provides %{_mingw32_findprovides}
> > %__mingw3
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Erik van Pienbroek wrote:
> Panu Matilainen schreef op vr 26-11-2010 om 13:20 [+0200]:
>> In particular, I'm interested in feedback on the new, pluggable and
>> enhanced dependency extration system. Documentation is scarce at the
>> moment but some background and examples can
Panu Matilainen schreef op vr 26-11-2010 om 13:20 [+0200]:
> In particular, I'm interested in feedback on the new, pluggable and
> enhanced dependency extration system. Documentation is scarce at the
> moment but some background and examples can be found here:
> http://laiskiainen.org/blog/?p=35
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>> "PM" == Panu Matilainen writes:
>
> PM> In particular, I'm interested in feedback on the new, pluggable and
> PM> enhanced dependency extration system. Documentation is scarce at the
> PM> moment but some background and examples can be found
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> On 11/26/2010 12:20 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>> It's that time of year again, although there seems to be an off-by-one bug
>> in the calendar system causing some inconsistency in the timing wrt last
>> year :P
>> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pi
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:15:47 -0600
"Jason L Tibbitts III" wrote:
> > "PM" == Panu Matilainen writes:
>
> PM> In particular, I'm interested in feedback on the new, pluggable
> PM> and enhanced dependency extration system. Documentation is scarce
> PM> at the moment but some background and ex
> "PM" == Panu Matilainen writes:
PM> In particular, I'm interested in feedback on the new, pluggable and
PM> enhanced dependency extration system. Documentation is scarce at the
PM> moment but some background and examples can be found here:
PM> http://laiskiainen.org/blog/?p=35
Unfortunatel
On 11/26/2010 12:20 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> It's that time of year again, although there seems to be an off-by-one bug
> in the calendar system causing some inconsistency in the timing wrt last
> year :P
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2009-November/042339.html
>
> Anyway, b
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 12:15:52 +0200 (EET)
> Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 28 Nov 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>
>>> Panu Matilainen wrote:
The draft release notes are at http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.9.0
>>>
>>> 1. This change:
>>> | Packages with
Le dimanche 28 novembre 2010 à 12:15 +0200, Panu Matilainen a écrit :
> On Sun, 28 Nov 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> > Panu Matilainen wrote:
> >> The draft release notes are at http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.9.0
> >
> > 1. This change:
> > | Packages with no files can now omit the %files section
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 12:15:52 +0200 (EET)
Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Nov 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> > Panu Matilainen wrote:
> >> The draft release notes are at http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.9.0
> >
> > 1. This change:
> > | Packages with no files can now omit the %files section and
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 11/28/2010 04:17 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>>
>> The new dependency generator is where I suspect some regressions might
>> be lurking - try building packages (for example ones that you maintain),
>> check that all the expected automatic dependencies
On 11/28/2010 04:17 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> The new dependency generator is where I suspect some regressions might
> be lurking - try building packages (for example ones that you maintain),
> check that all the expected automatic dependencies are there and that
> it doesn't fall over in othe
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 11/26/2010 04:50 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>> The draft release notes are at http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.9.0
>> and Fedora compatible SRPM(s) can be found at
>> http://laiskiainen.org/rpm/srpms/
>
> I am using this now on my Fedora 14 box and I h
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Panu Matilainen wrote:
>> The draft release notes are at http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.9.0
>
> 1. This change:
> | Packages with no files can now omit the %files section and still have
> | packages generated.
> is going to make it a PITA to conditionaliz
Panu Matilainen wrote:
> The draft release notes are at http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.9.0
1. This change:
| Packages with no files can now omit the %files section and still have
| packages generated.
is going to make it a PITA to conditionalize the building of subpackages,
and it's going to brea
On 11/26/2010 04:50 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> The draft release notes are at http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.9.0
> and Fedora compatible SRPM(s) can be found at
> http://laiskiainen.org/rpm/srpms/
I am using this now on my Fedora 14 box and I haven't noticed any
obvious breakages. Beyond that,
2010/11/26 Panu Matilainen :
> the new, pluggable and enhanced dependency extration system.
That's really awesome!
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
It's that time of year again, although there seems to be an off-by-one bug
in the calendar system causing some inconsistency in the timing wrt last
year :P
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2009-November/042339.html
Anyway, before going to beta and starting the inevitable Fedora Fe
22 matches
Mail list logo
