Glad I could help out, Jan! Of course, I will be getting a newer computer
shortly, because this one is showing signs of ware.
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Jan Synacek wrote:
> On 05/05/12 at 08:46pm, Richard Vickery wrote:
> > - Selinux Audit Begin --
On 05/05/12 at 08:46pm, Richard Vickery wrote:
> - Selinux Audit Begin
>
>
> **Unmatched Entries**
>
Thank you, Richard!
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, BaseOS team Brno, Red Hat
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admi
- Selinux Audit Begin
**Unmatched Entries**
type=1131 audit(1335206040.736:102): pid=0 uid=0 auid=4294967295
ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0 msg=' comm="mcelog"
exe="/bin/systemd" hostname=? addr=? terminal=? res=failed'
type=1131
never-mind. I found them; I was just being lazy.
Jan: How do you want me to report these?
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Richard Vickery wrote:
> Hi Jan:
>
> I just ran this; what qualifies as an "unmatched entry"? How am I to spot
> one?
>
> Richard
>
>
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Micha
Hi Jan:
I just ran this; what qualifies as an "unmatched entry"? How am I to spot
one?
Richard
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> Reindl Harald wrote:
> > i do not speak about pushig them to updates-testing or even stable
> > i speak about "give me a koji-build which i can
Reindl Harald wrote:
> i do not speak about pushig them to updates-testing or even stable
> i speak about "give me a koji-build which i can test"
Making the fix apply to the stable release often requires additional
backporting effort.
Michal
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
ht
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
http://fpaste.org/GEwJ/
Kevin
DON'T PANIC
On Fri, 4 May 2012, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 04.05.2012 18:16, schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
On Fri, 04 May 2012 18:07:04 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
that is not my point
my point is when i make a bu
Am 04.05.2012 18:16, schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
> On Fri, 04 May 2012 18:07:04 +0200
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> that is not my point
>>
>> my point is when i make a bugreport for F15/F16 why
>> it is first built for F17, notified and a day later
>> built for F16
>>
> There may be any number of reaso
On Fri, 04 May 2012 18:07:04 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
> that is not my point
>
> my point is when i make a bugreport for F15/F16 why
> it is first built for F17, notified and a day later
> built for F16 (FAIR after a additional comment from
> me that i need a F16 build which does no longer
> a
Am 04.05.2012 17:58, schrieb Thomas Moschny:
> 2012/5/4 Reindl Harald :
>> dear maintainers: please take a tighter look for which
>> release bugs are reported and consider that the reporter
>> has exactly this and only this version installed and is
>> not very happy about a "has been submitted as
2012/5/4 Reindl Harald :
> dear maintainers: please take a tighter look for which
> release bugs are reported and consider that the reporter
> has exactly this and only this version installed and is
> not very happy about a "has been submitted as an update
> for Fedora 17" notify without finding an
Am 04.05.2012 14:01, schrieb Frank Murphy:
> On 04/05/12 12:54, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 04.05.2012 13:48, schrieb Frank Murphy:
>>> On 04/05/12 09:35, Jan Synacek wrote:
>>>
>>> should last 24hrs
>>>
>>> http://fpaste.org/yH9I/
>>> http://fpaste.org/aOLp/
>>> http://fpaste.org/Lpbn/
>>>
Am 04.05.2012 13:48, schrieb Frank Murphy:
> On 04/05/12 09:35, Jan Synacek wrote:
>
> should last 24hrs
>
> http://fpaste.org/yH9I/
> http://fpaste.org/aOLp/
> http://fpaste.org/Lpbn/
> http://fpaste.org/c9FR/
you noticed your "Date Range Processed: all"?
___
call "/etc/cron.dail
Am 04.05.2012 10:38, schrieb Frank Murphy:
> On 04/05/12 09:35, Jan Synacek wrote:
>> Hello list,
>>
>> I'm looking for as many logwatch runs in Fedora 16 as possible. I need to
>> test
>> the F17 package so I know if there are any problems with compatibility.
>>
>
> Typo?, or you want to run t
On 04/05/12 13:08, Reindl Harald wrote:
surely you can
but what did you like to tell us with "should last 24hrs"
if you call it with "--range all"?
Where are the links?
--
Regards,
Frank
"Jack of all, fubars"
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.or
On 05/04/12 at 01:01pm, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 04/05/12 12:54, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> >
> >Am 04.05.2012 13:48, schrieb Frank Murphy:
> >>On 04/05/12 09:35, Jan Synacek wrote:
> >>
> >>should last 24hrs
> >>
> >>http://fpaste.org/yH9I/
> >>http://fpaste.org/aOLp/
> >>http://fpaste.org/Lpbn/
>
On 04/05/12 12:54, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 04.05.2012 13:48, schrieb Frank Murphy:
On 04/05/12 09:35, Jan Synacek wrote:
should last 24hrs
http://fpaste.org/yH9I/
http://fpaste.org/aOLp/
http://fpaste.org/Lpbn/
http://fpaste.org/c9FR/
you noticed your "Date Range Processed: all"?
_
On 04/05/12 09:35, Jan Synacek wrote:
should last 24hrs
http://fpaste.org/yH9I/
http://fpaste.org/aOLp/
http://fpaste.org/Lpbn/
http://fpaste.org/c9FR/
--
Regards,
Frank
"Jack of all, fubars"
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinf
On 04/05/12 10:47, Jan Synacek wrote:
On 05/04/12 at 09:38am, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 04/05/12 09:35, Jan Synacek wrote:
Hello list,
I'm looking for as many logwatch runs in Fedora 16 as possible. I need to test
the F17 package so I know if there are any problems with compatibility.
Typo?, o
On 05/04/12 at 09:38am, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 04/05/12 09:35, Jan Synacek wrote:
> >Hello list,
> >
> >I'm looking for as many logwatch runs in Fedora 16 as possible. I need to
> >test
> >the F17 package so I know if there are any problems with compatibility.
> >
>
> Typo?, or you want to run
On 05/04/2012 10:12 AM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
Hi!
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:
Hello list,
I'm looking for as many logwatch runs in Fedora 16 as possible. I need to test
the F17 package so I know if there are any problems with compatibility.
Please, consider install
Hi!
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I'm looking for as many logwatch runs in Fedora 16 as possible. I need to test
> the F17 package so I know if there are any problems with compatibility.
>
> Please, consider installing the new build [1], running it, sending
On 04/05/12 09:35, Jan Synacek wrote:
Hello list,
I'm looking for as many logwatch runs in Fedora 16 as possible. I need to test
the F17 package so I know if there are any problems with compatibility.
Typo?, or you want to run the F17 pkg in F16?
--
Regards,
Frank
"Jack of all, fubars"
--
d
Hello list,
I'm looking for as many logwatch runs in Fedora 16 as possible. I need to test
the F17 package so I know if there are any problems with compatibility.
Please, consider installing the new build [1], running it, sending me a logwatch
report and possibly sending logs (obfuscated if need
24 matches
Mail list logo
