On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 11:46 +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
>
> Yes, typical problem is (usually) completely broken .pc (pkg-config)
> file. My experience is that developers don't have a clue about
> 'Requires.private' pkg-config field and they add all libraries to
> 'Requires' or 'Libs', so then binaries
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 02:33:34PM -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
> # ldd /usr/bin/msntest | wc -l
> 20
> # ldd /usr/lib64/libmsn.so.0.3.0 | wc -l
> 9
Please, be careful. ldd(1) prints recursively all dependencies.
$ ldd /usr/bin/msntest | wc -l
20
$ readelf
On Sun, 2011-11-20 at 21:36 +, John5342 wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 19:33, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > On Sunday, November 20, 2011 02:14:09 PM drago01 wrote:
> >> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Kevin Kofler
> >> wrote:
> >> > Steve Grubb wrote:
> >> >> For example, if a 32 bit library is
Does anybody know of anything I can try in Fedora 16 to get the other half
of my files from the Deja DUP backup?
Thanks,
Richard
On Nov 20, 2011 7:17 AM, "Steve Grubb" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was curious how many library packages we have that also includes
> applications in
> them, so I wrote a s
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 19:33, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Sunday, November 20, 2011 02:14:09 PM drago01 wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> > Steve Grubb wrote:
>> >> For example, if a 32 bit library is installed, which application is left
>> >> - the 64 or 32 bit one?
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 02:33:34PM -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Sunday, November 20, 2011 02:14:09 PM drago01 wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Kevin Kofler
> > wrote:
> > > Steve Grubb wrote:
> > >> For example, if a 32 bit library is installed, which application is left
> > >> - the
On Sunday, November 20, 2011 02:14:09 PM drago01 wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Steve Grubb wrote:
> >> For example, if a 32 bit library is installed, which application is left
> >> - the 64 or 32 bit one?
> >
> > If you install ONLY the 32-bit multilib, the 32-
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Steve Grubb wrote:
>> For example, if a 32 bit library is installed, which application is left -
>> the 64 or 32 bit one?
>
> If you install ONLY the 32-bit multilib, the 32-bit version.
> If you install BOTH the 64-bit and 32-bit packages, th
Steve Grubb wrote:
> For example, if a 32 bit library is installed, which application is left -
> the 64 or 32 bit one?
If you install ONLY the 32-bit multilib, the 32-bit version.
If you install BOTH the 64-bit and 32-bit packages, the 64-bit version (on
all the platforms where 64-bit is preferr
On Sunday, November 20, 2011 10:26:09 AM Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Sunday, November 20, 2011 10:20:51 AM Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I was curious how many library packages we have that also includes
> > > applications in them,
On Sunday, November 20, 2011 10:20:51 AM Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was curious how many library packages we have that also includes
> > applications in them, so I wrote a small shell script:
> >
> > http://people.redhat.com/sgru
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Steve Grubb wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was curious how many library packages we have that also includes
> applications in
> them, so I wrote a small shell script:
>
> http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/security/lib-bin-check
That just checks for a path. It doesn't chec
Hello,
I was curious how many library packages we have that also includes applications
in
them, so I wrote a small shell script:
http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/security/lib-bin-check
On my F16 installation, it finds around 60 packages that are libraries with
applications. I'd like to ask if
13 matches
Mail list logo