On 25. 01. 23 12:22, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 12:18:59PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 24. 01. 23 18:57, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:50 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
NOTE: As explained by the owners in the Feedback section below, this
proposal was su
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 12:18:59PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 24. 01. 23 18:57, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:50 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> > >
> > > NOTE: As explained by the owners in the Feedback section below, this
> > > proposal was submitted after the deadline because th
On 24. 01. 23 18:57, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:50 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
NOTE: As explained by the owners in the Feedback section below, this
proposal was submitted after the deadline because the impact of the
package update proved to be broader than anticipated.
https://fedo
On 24. 01. 23 18:57, Neal Gompa wrote:
Also, isn't this basically going to break the pythondistdeps
generator, since it was switched to use packaging a while ago?
Break? No. It will only handle some invalid requirements or provided version as
errors. The affected packages are listed in the pro
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:50 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> NOTE: As explained by the owners in the Feedback section below, this
> proposal was submitted after the deadline because the impact of the
> package update proved to be broader than anticipated.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Packa
NOTE: As explained by the owners in the Feedback section below, this
proposal was submitted after the deadline because the impact of the
package update proved to be broader than anticipated.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Packaging_22%2B
This document represents a proposed Change. As part
