Hi Kevin,
> Not impossible, but we would probibly want it running inside Fedora
> Infrastructure and need to be careful security wise.
That is also a part of our design.
Kind regards,
-- Jan Pacner
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis
On Thu, 03 Jul 2014 17:20:58 +0200
"jpac...@redhat.com" wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> > Detecting soname bumps and doing real rebuilds
> > instead of scratch build should be possible. Koschei could
> > automatically start rebuilding dependent packages AFTER you update
> > the library in rawhide.
>
>
Hi Michael,
> Detecting soname bumps and doing real rebuilds
> instead of scratch build should be possible. Koschei could automatically start
> rebuilding dependent packages AFTER you update the library in rawhide.
That's the goal.
> But if
> you want to know what will break before you do the up
On 2014-07-02, jpac...@redhat.com wrote:
>> The rebuilds run in koji. You cannot get scratch build into koji build
>> root. You would need separate koji build target tag for that.
>
> I understood that Koschei does it anyway (to be able to rebuild the
> dependency subtree).
Speculation: Or it doe
- Original Message -
> From: jpac...@redhat.com
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, July 1, 2014 5:41:45 PM
> Subject: Re: Koschei - continuous rebuilds for packages
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> it sounds like a way how one could automatically hand
Hi Petr,
> The rebuilds run in koji. You cannot get scratch build into koji build
> root. You would need separate koji build target tag for that.
I understood that Koschei does it anyway (to be able to rebuild the
dependency subtree). Either way, it doesn't sound problematic to create
temporary t
On 2014-07-01, jpac...@redhat.com wrote:
> it sounds like a way how one could automatically handle library so-bumps
> in rawhide. Idea discussed with hhorak, jzeleny, pingou and others was
> to bump the library package, rebuild the dependency tree depending on
> this library and if some of them fa
Colin Walters writes:
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2014, at 12:53 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
>> Yes, soname bumps are nonevents with OBS, since everything is
>> automatically rebuilt. Sounds like Koschei is a big step towards that.
>
> I've always found it really strange how so many people talk about
> "
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014, at 12:53 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Yes, soname bumps are nonevents with OBS, since everything is
> automatically rebuilt. Sounds like Koschei is a big step towards that.
I've always found it really strange how so many people talk about
"rebuilding" for soname bumps. The
On Tue, 2014-07-01 at 19:19 +0200, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
>
> Sounds a lot like what openSUSE's Open Build Service does. I think
> they
> automatically trigger rebuilds of dependees when a provide they depend
> on goes away due to a rebuild, so SONAME bumps are a breeze.
Yes, soname bumps are none
On Tue, 2014-07-01 at 10:13 -0400, Michael Simacek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Recently I've been working on Koschei - a new continuous rebuilding tool for
> Fedora and I'd like to announce it publicly and get some feedback.
>
> How will it work?
> It will have a set of tracked packages for which it will
Hi Michael,
it sounds like a way how one could automatically handle library so-bumps
in rawhide. Idea discussed with hhorak, jzeleny, pingou and others was
to bump the library package, rebuild the dependency tree depending on
this library and if some of them fail, notify it's maintainer(s) and the
Hello,
Recently I've been working on Koschei - a new continuous rebuilding tool for
Fedora and I'd like to announce it publicly and get some feedback.
How will it work?
It will have a set of tracked packages for which it will watch dependency
updates and will (scratch) rebuild packages in Koji af
13 matches
Mail list logo
