I think Josh wrote nice blog about "kernel release cycle":
http://jwboyer.livejournal.com/51935.html
Based on it, I'd be surprised to see 4.6 land in F24 prior stable release.
Vít
Dne 18.5.2016 v 17:27 Matthew Miller napsal(a):
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 05:44:43PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 05:44:43PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> There is more extensive testing performed before GA release then
> there is in the update process hence what get's shipped in the GA
> release has better testing coverage regardless of people believes in
> Red Hat's kernel tea
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>I can't recall Fedora shipping with a
> mainline kernel.
Ha, well that's obviously wrong. Often Fedora has rc's in alpha and
ships with that released kernel. So never mind on that point!
In any case it's up to the kernel team. I don't think a
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
wrote:
> On 05/17/2016 05:25 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
>> I refuse the premise that the kernel team is going to release a 4.6.x
>> kernel that isn't ready as a 0 day update.
>
>
> There is more extensive testing performed before GA release th
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 17:44:43 +,
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 05/17/2016 05:25 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
I refuse the premise that the kernel team is going to release a 4.6.x
kernel that isn't ready as a 0 day update.
There is more extensive testing performed before GA release the
On 05/17/2016 05:25 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
I refuse the premise that the kernel team is going to release a 4.6.x
kernel that isn't ready as a 0 day update.
There is more extensive testing performed before GA release then there
is in the update process hence what get's shipped in the GA relea
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
wrote:
>
>
> On 05/17/2016 04:32 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 03/16/2016 04:01 PM, Justin Forbes wrote:
With the 4.5 kernel out and the merge window f
On 05/17/2016 04:32 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
wrote:
On 03/16/2016 04:01 PM, Justin Forbes wrote:
With the 4.5 kernel out and the merge window for 4.6 opened up, we had
to make a decision on what the release kernel for F24 would be. The
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
wrote:
>
>
> On 03/16/2016 04:01 PM, Justin Forbes wrote:
>>
>> With the 4.5 kernel out and the merge window for 4.6 opened up, we had
>> to make a decision on what the release kernel for F24 would be. The
>> decision has been made to ship F2
On 03/16/2016 04:01 PM, Justin Forbes wrote:
With the 4.5 kernel out and the merge window for 4.6 opened up, we had
to make a decision on what the release kernel for F24 would be. The
decision has been made to ship F24 with the 4.5 kernel with 4.6
available as an update once it is ready. Timi
With the 4.5 kernel out and the merge window for 4.6 opened up, we had
to make a decision on what the release kernel for F24 would be. The
decision has been made to ship F24 with the 4.5 kernel with 4.6
available as an update once it is ready. Timing wise, 4.6 *should*
release just before the fin
11 matches
Mail list logo
