On Tue, Mar 6, 2018, at 3:27 AM, Samuel Rakitničan wrote:
> But what are the original reasons exactly? Seems like those files are
> used by rpm-ostree.
The `/usr` files are also copied by grubby. And while it's true *today*
that rpm-ostree adapted to the /usr/lib/modules change, in fact the
rp
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 1:11 AM, Samuel Rakitničan
>
> What is the result you expect from this email? You filed a bug, it
> was closed because the packaging was done intentionally and there is
> no other solution when considering the original reasons for the
> change.
But what are the original
> What is the result you expect from this email? You filed a bug, it
was closed because the packaging was done intentionally and there is
no other solution when considering the original reasons for the
change. I'm not sure if you want the original change reverted
entirely or what you would like t
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 1:11 AM, Samuel Rakitničan
wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> I've stumbled upon a serious issue that has not been discussed before.
> Somewhere around May 2015 kernel files was moved to
> /usr/lib/modules/, which are then copied to /boot in post
> scriptlets [1]. The issue is that
Dear list,
I've stumbled upon a serious issue that has not been discussed before.
Somewhere around May 2015 kernel files was moved to
/usr/lib/modules/, which are then copied to /boot in post scriptlets
[1]. The issue is that such files are marked with %ghost because they don't
exist initially
