Le vendredi 02 novembre 2018 à 03:48 +0100, Kevin Kofler a écrit :
Hi Kevin,
> I don't think you even have to ask the people who contributed in this
> case,
> because you are converting from LGPLv3+ to GPLv3+, which the licenses
> are
> designed to allow.
That was more or less my understanding
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Just FYI, I intend to relicense fontpackages from LGPL3+ to GPL3+, to
> make sharing parts with go-macros easier.
>
> Since fontpackages only contains templates and scripts and is not linked
> anywhere there is no practical difference.
>
> If you see a problem with this c
Le mardi 30 octobre 2018 à 11:47 +0530, Parag Nemade a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 9:14 PM Nicolas Mailhot <
> nicolas.mail...@laposte.net> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Just FYI, I intend to relicense fontpackages from LGPL3+ to GPL3+,
> > to
> > make sharing parts with go-macros easi
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 9:14 PM Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just FYI, I intend to relicense fontpackages from LGPL3+ to GPL3+, to
> make sharing parts with go-macros easier.
>
Can it be possible for you to explain this further? I want to understand
how license change can help here.
Hi all,
Just FYI, I intend to relicense fontpackages from LGPL3+ to GPL3+, to
make sharing parts with go-macros easier.
Since fontpackages only contains templates and scripts and is not linked
anywhere there is no practical difference.
If you see a problem with this change, or have contributed t