On Wed, 2023-02-15 at 14:02 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> In accordance with FESCo's Inactive Packager Policy[1], packagers
> that
> have been identified as inactive have a ticket in the
> find-inactive-packagers repo[2]. One week after the final release,
> packagers who remain inactive will be remove
Il 16/02/23 21:45, Mattia Verga ha scritto:
> Il 16/02/23 20:26, Mattia Verga ha scritto:
>> Il 16/02/23 18:36, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
>>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 09:04:01AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 6:29 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
wrote:
> I'm a little surprised
Il 17/02/23 17:14, Ben Cotton ha scritto:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 1:48 AM Mattia Verga via devel
> wrote:
>> During the weekend I can write down a script reusing partial code from
>> the find_inactive_packagers script and purge the ticket list from users
>> that showed activity in RH bugzilla, l
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 1:48 AM Mattia Verga via devel
wrote:
>
> During the weekend I can write down a script reusing partial code from
> the find_inactive_packagers script and purge the ticket list from users
> that showed activity in RH bugzilla, let me know if you want me to
> proceed. Or I ca
Il 16/02/23 22:30, Ben Cotton ha scritto:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 3:45 PM Mattia Verga via devel
> wrote:
>> This user should not have been detected as inactive if the Bugzilla
>> check was run. @Ben, maybe you forgot to set the BZ_API_KEY before
>> running the script?
> I didn't forget, I inten
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 3:45 PM Mattia Verga via devel
wrote:
>
> This user should not have been detected as inactive if the Bugzilla
> check was run. @Ben, maybe you forgot to set the BZ_API_KEY before
> running the script?
I didn't forget, I intentionally did not. I thought we had already
modif
Il 16/02/23 20:26, Mattia Verga ha scritto:
> Il 16/02/23 18:36, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 09:04:01AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 6:29 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
>>> wrote:
I'm a little surprised that the pagure ticket doesn't have the
mainta
Il 16/02/23 18:36, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 09:04:01AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 6:29 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
>> wrote:
>>> I'm a little surprised that the pagure ticket doesn't have the
>>> maintainer to whom it refers added as a subscriber to the
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 09:04:01AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 6:29 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
> wrote:
> >
> > I'm a little surprised that the pagure ticket doesn't have the
> > maintainer to whom it refers added as a subscriber to the ticket.
>
> As far as I know, you can't s
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 6:29 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> I'm a little surprised that the pagure ticket doesn't have the
> maintainer to whom it refers added as a subscriber to the ticket.
As far as I know, you can't subscribe others to a ticket the way you
can add a CC in Bugzilla. We could
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 5:20 PM Paul Wouters wrote:
>
> How many packages depend _only_ on people from this list? Eg are likely
> to be unmaintained ?
There's a command in the script that will check the impact, but I'm
going to hold off on running it for a bit. It takes a long time to
iterate ove
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 08:25, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 05:56, Richard W.M. Jones
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 02:02:54PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
>> > In accordance with FESCo's Inactive Packager Policy[1], packagers that
>> > have been identified as inactive
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 05:56, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 02:02:54PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > In accordance with FESCo's Inactive Packager Policy[1], packagers that
> > have been identified as inactive have a ticket in the
> > find-inactive-packagers repo[2]. One week
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 10:55:55AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 02:02:54PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > In accordance with FESCo's Inactive Packager Policy[1], packagers that
> > have been identified as inactive have a ticket in the
> > find-inactive-packagers repo[2].
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 02:02:54PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> In accordance with FESCo's Inactive Packager Policy[1], packagers that
> have been identified as inactive have a ticket in the
> find-inactive-packagers repo[2]. One week after the final release,
> packagers who remain inactive will be r
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023, Ben Cotton wrote:
For the curious, here are the stats from today's run:
### Found 2129 users in the packager group. ###
### Found 914 users with no activity in pagure/src.fp.org over the
last year. ###
### Found 845 users which also show no activity in Bodhi over the last y
In accordance with FESCo's Inactive Packager Policy[1], packagers that
have been identified as inactive have a ticket in the
find-inactive-packagers repo[2]. One week after the final release,
packagers who remain inactive will be removed from the packager group.
(Note that pagure.io is one of the s
17 matches
Mail list logo
