I am going to hold off on this as I have run into an issue where bundles
installed using and update site don't work with bundles installed using
rpm if there is a bundle conflict between the two.
I am investigating.
After looking into this I realized that we cannot move forward with the
recon
So let's give these packages a couple of days and start (hopefully also
finish) committing by Monday.
I am going to hold off on this as I have run into an issue where bundles
installed using and update site don't work with bundles installed using
rpm if there is a bundle conflict between the
(https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5021) so I will send out the
message as soon as that is approved. The goal is to finish this before
f17 branches from rawhide.
Unfortunately I have missed the above deadline but here is an update of
I have been upto:
Before the custom tag was created
I will be filing a request to update the Eclipse packaging guidelines.
Hi Everybody,
Now that the new packaging guidelines have been approved
(https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/122) it will soon be time to
implement these improvements in all Eclipse packages. The official
packaging guidel
On 11/01/2011 10:56 AM, sami wagiaalla wrote:
>
>> [...] One note, I don't like macros that span multiple scriptlets.
>> Having a macro for each scriptlet (or forgoing a macro if the resulting code
>> is simple enough) seems to be about the right level of indirection.
>>
>
> It does not look pretty
> [...] One note, I don't like macros that span multiple scriptlets.
> Having a macro for each scriptlet (or forgoing a macro if the resulting code
> is simple enough) seems to be about the right level of indirection.
>
It does not look pretty I agree, but my motivation is to make things
simple
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 11:20:46AM -0400, sami wagiaalla wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The way we currently install Eclipse plugins in Fedora is incorrect and
> somewhat fragile.
>
> RPM places all the plugin artifacts in the proper directories. However
> that does not update the eclipse metadata. This mean
On 10/26/2011 11:37 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 10/26/2011 09:20 AM, sami wagiaalla wrote:
>> To add support for this in your eclipse package you have to add the
>> following line to your rpm spec file:
>>
>> %_eclipse_pkg [package name]
>
> For what Fedora versions is this applicable to?
>
ra
On 10/26/2011 09:20 AM, sami wagiaalla wrote:
> To add support for this in your eclipse package you have to add the
> following line to your rpm spec file:
>
> %_eclipse_pkg [package name]
For what Fedora versions is this applicable to?
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 3
Hi,
The way we currently install Eclipse plugins in Fedora is incorrect and
somewhat fragile.
RPM places all the plugin artifacts in the proper directories. However
that does not update the eclipse metadata. This means that until the
next time eclipse starts it is unaware of the newly installe
10 matches
Mail list logo
