Re: How to handle a dead package in Fedora with a need in RHEL

2010-09-10 Thread Paul Howarth
On 10/09/10 10:15, Iain Arnell wrote: > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: >> On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 20:11:13 -0400 >> Matthew Miller wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 04:41:01PM -0700, Wes Hardaker wrote: But the perl-Net-DNS-SEC package requires Digest::SHA which doesn't

Re: How to handle a dead package in Fedora with a need in RHEL

2010-09-10 Thread Iain Arnell
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: > On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 20:11:13 -0400 > Matthew Miller wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 04:41:01PM -0700, Wes Hardaker wrote: >> > But the perl-Net-DNS-SEC package requires Digest::SHA which doesn't >> > exist on RHEL.  How do I convert a dead

Re: How to handle a dead package in Fedora with a need in RHEL

2010-09-10 Thread Paul Howarth
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 20:11:13 -0400 Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 04:41:01PM -0700, Wes Hardaker wrote: > > But the perl-Net-DNS-SEC package requires Digest::SHA which doesn't > > exist on RHEL. How do I convert a dead package on the fedora side > > to a EL only set of branches?

Re: How to handle a dead package in Fedora with a need in RHEL

2010-09-09 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 04:41:01PM -0700, Wes Hardaker wrote: > But the perl-Net-DNS-SEC package requires Digest::SHA which doesn't > exist on RHEL. How do I convert a dead package on the fedora side to a > EL only set of branches? I'd assume it'll be the original bug request > and re-opening a n

How to handle a dead package in Fedora with a need in RHEL

2010-09-09 Thread Wes Hardaker
So, perl-Digest-SHA went away on the fedora side of things and got auto-marked as dead in the package tree (not by me; I seem to recall it was something automatic or at least someone else). This was actually quite a while ago. But the perl-Net-DNS-SEC package requires Digest::SHA which doesn't e