On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 18:54 +, Quentin Armitage wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 10:26 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Quentin Armitage wrote:
> >
> > > The glibc packages (including nscd) were in updates-testing, but have
> > > been obsoleted, and so 2.11.90-12 is now the
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 10:26 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
>
> On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Quentin Armitage wrote:
>
> > The glibc packages (including nscd) were in updates-testing, but have
> > been obsoleted, and so 2.11.90-12 is now the current version again. What
> > is the mechanism for becoming aware tha
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Quentin Armitage wrote:
> The glibc packages (including nscd) were in updates-testing, but have
> been obsoleted, and so 2.11.90-12 is now the current version again. What
> is the mechanism for becoming aware that a package that has been
> installed through updates-testing ha
My F-13 system produces the following output from yum list extras:
Extra Packages
glibc.i686 2.11.90-14
installed
glibc-common.i686 2.11.90-14
installed
glibc-devel.i686 2.11.90-14
@updates-testing
glibc-headers.i686