> For linked-list,
> And you see the temp_dir rubygem dep is used for only
> spec/archive_spec.rb context "::load" and "#write!".
>
> ```
> $ grep -r temp_dir spec/
> ```
>
> spec/archive_spec.rb
>
> ```
Thanks that fixes the %check
> context "::load" do
> ...
> end
>
> context "#write!"
For linked-list,
> + ruby -Ilib:. -e 'Dir.glob "test/**/test_*.rb", &method(:require)'
...
> 0 runs, 0 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 skips
> + popd
"test/**/test_*.rb" you are using is incorrect in this case, and
different from the guideline. The test files were not captured..
"./test/**/*_
Dne 04. 12. 19 v 12:28 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> Dne 03. 12. 19 v 23:43 Leigh Scott napsal(a):
>> Thanks, I didn't know about gem2rpm.
>>
>> Reviews submitted (needed for sassc tests).
>
> Out of curiosity, where I can find the tests?
Answering to myself:
https://github.com/sass/sass-spec
Vít
Dne 03. 12. 19 v 23:43 Leigh Scott napsal(a):
> Thanks, I didn't know about gem2rpm.
>
> Reviews submitted (needed for sassc tests).
Out of curiosity, where I can find the tests?
Vít
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779403
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779404
Thank you for the examples and hints
> 2. Adding %check section, as Jaroslav said.
> Note that we do not use "bundler" ("bundle" command) and
> "rake"
> command in RPM *.spec file.
>
I have removed bundler and rake from linked-list, the test doesn't seem to run
anything
+ pushd ./usr/share/gem
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779403
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779404
I checked your uploaded *.spec files now a little bit.
I see that you are using "rake" in your rubygem-linked-list.spec,
and there is no %check section in your rubygem-hrx.spec.
> Note that
Hi Leigh,
Thank you for contributing the rubygem-* packages.
Let me comment for your *.spec files.
I recommend to compare the *.spec file generated by gem2rpm with your
*.spec file, and align basically.
The gem2rpm guides you.
How to do it (For example in case of Fedora 30)
```
$ sudo dnf insta
Thanks, I didn't know about gem2rpm.
Reviews submitted (needed for sassc tests).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779403
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779404
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscri
Hi,
great to see someone taking up on some rubygems!
to the packages, the rubygem-linked-list as mentioned by Fabio have
binaries that will probably have name conflicts with some other packages.
Secondly rubygem-hrx should not have `Requires: rubygem(linked-list)`[0]
because that dependency
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 7:08 PM Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Can someone check these specfiles before I submit review requests please?
> I have zero experience with packaging rubygem packaes.
>
> https://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/SPECS/rubygem-hrx.spec
> https://leigh123linux.fedorapeop
Hi,
Can someone check these specfiles before I submit review requests please?
I have zero experience with packaging rubygem packaes.
https://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/SPECS/rubygem-hrx.spec
https://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/SPECS/rubygem-linked-list.spec
Best regards
Leigh
___
11 matches
Mail list logo