Re: Heads up: rpm 4.10.0 alpha to hit rawhide shortly

2012-03-21 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 03/21/2012 07:51 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: On 3/21/12 2:04 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote: as I assume createrepo (and thus deltarpm) doesn't actually get invoked in the srpm creation phase, right? That's correct. fedpkg is used to do the "fedpkg sources" call which downloads the tarball from loo

Re: Heads up: rpm 4.10.0 alpha to hit rawhide shortly

2012-03-21 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 03/21/2012 01:03 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote: On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 11:04 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: I'm starting to consider going dirty and just adding fake library provides for one build of rpm to get deltarpm "bootstrapped", as I assume createrepo (and thus deltarpm) doesn't actually get

Re: Heads up: rpm 4.10.0 alpha to hit rawhide shortly

2012-03-21 Thread Jonathan Dieter
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 11:04 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: > I'm starting to consider going dirty and just adding fake library provides > for one build of rpm to get deltarpm "bootstrapped", as I assume > createrepo (and thus deltarpm) doesn't actually get invoked in the srpm > creation phase, ri

Re: Heads up: rpm 4.10.0 alpha to hit rawhide shortly

2012-03-21 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 03/20/2012 07:37 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: On 3/20/12 8:10 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote: Ok, in F16 (and I'm assuming this is also true in Rawhide; unfortunately I don't have a Rawhide tree here to test), fedpkg is in the srpm-build group, and it requires pyrpkg which requires mock which requires

Re: Heads up: rpm 4.10.0 alpha to hit rawhide shortly

2012-03-20 Thread Jesse Keating
On 3/20/12 8:10 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote: Ok, in F16 (and I'm assuming this is also true in Rawhide; unfortunately I don't have a Rawhide tree here to test), fedpkg is in the srpm-build group, and it requires pyrpkg which requires mock which requires createrepo which requires deltarpm. I don't

Re: Heads up: rpm 4.10.0 alpha to hit rawhide shortly

2012-03-20 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 03/20/2012 05:10 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote: On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 16:15 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 03/20/2012 01:49 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote: On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 13:08 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: So... first hickup that broke koji: the buildroot now requires deltarpm which needs

Re: Heads up: rpm 4.10.0 alpha to hit rawhide shortly

2012-03-20 Thread Jonathan Dieter
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 16:15 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On 03/20/2012 01:49 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 13:08 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: > >> So... first hickup that broke koji: the buildroot now requires deltarpm > >> which needs rebuilding due to to the soname bump

Re: Heads up: rpm 4.10.0 alpha to hit rawhide shortly

2012-03-20 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 03/20/2012 01:49 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote: On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 13:08 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: So... first hickup that broke koji: the buildroot now requires deltarpm which needs rebuilding due to to the soname bump before we can proceed. I dont recall this being an issue before but I

Re: Heads up: rpm 4.10.0 alpha to hit rawhide shortly

2012-03-20 Thread Jonathan Dieter
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 13:08 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: > So... first hickup that broke koji: the buildroot now requires deltarpm > which needs rebuilding due to to the soname bump before we can proceed. > I dont recall this being an issue before but I guess that's called > progress :) Why do

Re: Heads up: rpm 4.10.0 alpha to hit rawhide shortly

2012-03-20 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 03/20/2012 11:52 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote: As http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/RPM4.10 got accepted in yesterday's FESCo meeting, here come the bits. For details see http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.10.0, but the bottom line is that for business-as-usual operations you shouldn't really

Heads up: rpm 4.10.0 alpha to hit rawhide shortly

2012-03-20 Thread Panu Matilainen
As http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/RPM4.10 got accepted in yesterday's FESCo meeting, here come the bits. For details see http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.10.0, but the bottom line is that for business-as-usual operations you shouldn't really notice much anything at all. Well, apart fro