Re: Heads up: Rebuild for Ruby 1.9.3

2012-01-30 Thread Bohuslav Kabrda
- Original Message - > On 01/30/2012 07:56 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > > - Original Message - > >> On 01/27/2012 12:21 PM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> Yes, we are of course trying to push the patches upstream, but it > >>> is a bit problematic, since the upstream says,

Re: Heads up: Rebuild for Ruby 1.9.3

2012-01-30 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 01/30/2012 07:56 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: - Original Message - On 01/27/2012 12:21 PM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: Yes, we are of course trying to push the patches upstream, but it is a bit problematic, since the upstream says, that this is an FHS-specific issue and they only want to

Re: Heads up: Rebuild for Ruby 1.9.3

2012-01-29 Thread Bohuslav Kabrda
- Original Message - > On 01/27/2012 12:21 PM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > > > > > Yes, we are of course trying to push the patches upstream, but it > > is a bit problematic, since the upstream says, that this is an > > FHS-specific issue and they only want to do general solutions - > > see

Re: Heads up: Rebuild for Ruby 1.9.3

2012-01-27 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 01/27/2012 12:21 PM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > > Yes, we are of course trying to push the patches upstream, but it is a bit > problematic, since the upstream says, that this is an FHS-specific issue and > they only want to do general solutions - see [1] for the discussion. > > Regards, > Boh

Re: Heads up: Rebuild for Ruby 1.9.3

2012-01-26 Thread Bohuslav Kabrda
- Original Message - > On 01/25/2012 02:10 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > 1) Always use Bundler provided by Fedora which will works as it > > should. > > 2) Force Ruby and RubyGems upstream to properly support FHS. I > > already > > provided patches [1] but I need your support. > > 3) Revert

Re: Heads up: Rebuild for Ruby 1.9.3

2012-01-26 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 01/25/2012 02:10 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > 1) Always use Bundler provided by Fedora which will works as it should. > 2) Force Ruby and RubyGems upstream to properly support FHS. I already > provided patches [1] but I need your support. > 3) Revert the customized behavior of RubyGems and break FH

Re: Heads up: Rebuild for Ruby 1.9.3

2012-01-25 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 25.1.2012 00:52, Rex Dieter napsal(a): Mo Morsi wrote: On 01/24/2012 04:50 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: Hi, since we finally got our Ruby 1.9.3 feature page [1] approved, we are starting rebuild for Ruby 1.9.3. Everyone who owns a package that depends on Ruby or Rubygems should rebuild it in

Re: Heads up: Rebuild for Ruby 1.9.3

2012-01-24 Thread Rex Dieter
Mo Morsi wrote: > On 01/24/2012 04:50 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: >> Hi, >> since we finally got our Ruby 1.9.3 feature page [1] approved, we are >> starting rebuild for Ruby 1.9.3. Everyone who owns a package that depends >> on Ruby or Rubygems should rebuild it in the special Koji target >> "f17-

Re: Heads up: Rebuild for Ruby 1.9.3

2012-01-24 Thread Mo Morsi
On 01/24/2012 04:50 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: Hi, since we finally got our Ruby 1.9.3 feature page [1] approved, we are starting rebuild for Ruby 1.9.3. Everyone who owns a package that depends on Ruby or Rubygems should rebuild it in the special Koji target "f17-ruby". This target will be mer

Heads up: Rebuild for Ruby 1.9.3

2012-01-24 Thread Bohuslav Kabrda
Hi, since we finally got our Ruby 1.9.3 feature page [1] approved, we are starting rebuild for Ruby 1.9.3. Everyone who owns a package that depends on Ruby or Rubygems should rebuild it in the special Koji target "f17-ruby". This target will be merged into rawhide just before the branching, whic