Il 22/05/2014 06:55, Mikolaj Izdebski ha scritto:
On 05/21/2014 08:06 PM, Robert Rati wrote:
So, who needed log4j2? It is massively incompatible with log4j1.2 and
isn't a simple port job. I would argue if log4j2 was actually needed,
it should have been introduced as a separate log4j2 package a
On 05/21/2014 08:06 PM, Robert Rati wrote:
> So, who needed log4j2? It is massively incompatible with log4j1.2 and
> isn't a simple port job. I would argue if log4j2 was actually needed,
> it should have been introduced as a separate log4j2 package and allow
> projects to port to it as they have
- Original Message -
> From: "Robert Rati"
> To: "Aleksandar Kurtakov" , "Development discussions
> related to Fedora"
>
> Cc: "Fedora Big Data SIG" , "Fedora Java
> Development List"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 2
rtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Rati"
To: "Fedora Big Data SIG" , "Development
discussions related to Fedora"
, "Fedora Java Development List"
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 7:03:42 PM
Subject: Hadoop + log4j2 =
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
> From: "Robert Rati"
> To: "Fedora Big Data SIG" , "Development
> discussions related to Fedora"
> , "Fedora Java Development List"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, May
On 21 May 2014 17:03, Robert Rati wrote:
> I've been working on updating the hadoop package to the latest 2.4.0
> release and at this point I've resolved all the issues but I'm now blocked
> by the log4j2 update. log4j2 breaks the hadoop build pretty severely, and
> it doesn't seem the log4j2 te
I've been working on updating the hadoop package to the latest 2.4.0
release and at this point I've resolved all the issues but I'm now
blocked by the log4j2 update. log4j2 breaks the hadoop build pretty
severely, and it doesn't seem the log4j2 team has spent much time
thinking about how to pr
