On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 09:43:14AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> TL;DR: Updates revoked, rawhide+f21 reverted to 0.12 without bump,
> deciding if we need to add epoch to revert back to 0.11.
Thank you.
I noticed, you're a bit quick in pushing updates to stable releases.
When pushing to older b
On 07/28/2014 10:40 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 28/07/2014 18:02, Miloslav Trmač ha scritto:
No, that would completely defeat the point of the soname. If
upstream won’t use sonames or symbol versioning, it’s better for
Fedora to patch the software to use them properly, even if it means
having t
Hi all,
Thanks for your comment. Those 2 updates was already canceled
yesterday as I've realized the problem after Sandro's bug report.
TL;DR: Updates revoked, rawhide+f21 reverted to 0.12 without bump,
deciding if we need to add epoch to revert back to 0.11.
It's tricky now.
1. Upstream change
Il 28/07/2014 18:02, Miloslav Trmač ha scritto:
> No, that would completely defeat the point of the soname. If
> upstream won’t use sonames or symbol versioning, it’s better for
> Fedora to patch the software to use them properly, even if it means
> having to continue to patch it. IIRC we do have
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 12:02:24 -0400 (EDT), Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> If upstream won’t use sonames or symbol versioning, it’s better for Fedora to
> patch the software to use them properly, even if it means having to continue
> to patch it. IIRC we do have various packages that have to do this.
>
On Mon, 2014-07-28 at 12:02 -0400, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 08:53:53PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> > > As upstream didn't seriously consider the API breakage, json
> > > 0.11->0.12 brings an issue of one function which is deprecated from
- Original Message -
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 08:53:53PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> > As upstream didn't seriously consider the API breakage, json
> > 0.11->0.12 brings an issue of one function which is deprecated from
> > now on. This has caused bug 1123785
>
> > so I will bump the
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As upstream didn't seriously consider the API breakage, json
> 0.11->0.12 brings an issue of one function which is deprecated from
> now on. This has caused bug 1123785 so I will bump the soname
> manually:
>
> libjson-c.so.2.0.1->
Le 28/07/2014 16:03, Peter Robinson a écrit :
>>> If the udpate broke packages: a) it should not have been updated on stable
>>> releases (was it?),
>>
>> Two updates have been filed hours ago,
>>
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/json-c-0.12-1.fc20
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/u
>> If the udpate broke packages: a) it should not have been updated on stable
>> releases (was it?),
>
> Two updates have been filed hours ago,
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/json-c-0.12-1.fc20
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/json-c-0.12-1.el6
>
> and it seems the upgrade
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 08:53:53PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As upstream didn't seriously consider the API breakage, json
> 0.11->0.12 brings an issue of one function which is deprecated from
> now on. This has caused bug 1123785 so I will bump the soname
> manually:
>
> libjson-c.
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 15:36:48 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> If the udpate broke packages: a) it should not have been updated on stable
> releases (was it?),
Two updates have been filed hours ago,
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/json-c-0.12-1.fc20
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/u
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 08:53:53PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As upstream didn't seriously consider the API breakage, json
> 0.11->0.12 brings an issue of one function which is deprecated from
> now on. This has caused bug 1123785
> so I will bump the soname manually
I'm sorry, wat
Le 28/07/2014 14:53, Christopher Meng a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> As upstream didn't seriously consider the API breakage, json
> 0.11->0.12 brings an issue of one function which is deprecated from
> now on. This has caused bug 1123785 so I will bump the soname
> manually:
Please consider reverting to 0.
Hi,
As upstream didn't seriously consider the API breakage, json
0.11->0.12 brings an issue of one function which is deprecated from
now on. This has caused bug 1123785 so I will bump the soname
manually:
libjson-c.so.2.0.1->libjson-c.so.3.0.0
Potentially affected:
abrt-plugin-bodhi-0:2.2.2-4.f
15 matches
Mail list logo
