Re: HEADS UP: libwebp-0.6.0 soname bumps

2017-02-02 Thread Sandro Mani
On 02.02.2017 22:03, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 02/02/17 10:02 +0100, Sandro Mani wrote: On 01.02.2017 18:59, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi I'm about to fire off the libwebp and mingw-libwebp 0.6.0 updates, which include soname bumps. I'm rebuilding all of the dependent packages: A quick status

Re: HEADS UP: libwebp-0.6.0 soname bumps

2017-02-02 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 02/02/17 10:02 +0100, Sandro Mani wrote: On 01.02.2017 18:59, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi I'm about to fire off the libwebp and mingw-libwebp 0.6.0 updates, which include soname bumps. I'm rebuilding all of the dependent packages: A quick status update here on the packages not yet rebuilt:

Re: HEADS UP: libwebp-0.6.0 soname bumps

2017-02-02 Thread Kalev Lember
On 02/02/2017 10:04 AM, Sandro Mani wrote: > On 02.02.2017 08:49, Kalev Lember wrote: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418572 is the review for >> compat-libwebp05 package I put together just now. >> > I see the review is already taken care of. Happy to help maintaining if > required

Re: HEADS UP: libwebp-0.6.0 soname bumps

2017-02-02 Thread Sandro Mani
On 01.02.2017 23:58, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: Hi Sandro, could you please tell me, when gnuplot has been rebuilt successfully? Gnuplot is now built. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel

Re: HEADS UP: libwebp-0.6.0 soname bumps

2017-02-02 Thread Sandro Mani
On 02.02.2017 08:49, Kalev Lember wrote: On 02/02/2017 08:12 AM, Kalev Lember wrote: Hi Sandro, Thanks for working on this! The number of packages affected by the soname bump is quite big though and I think it needs a compat package. We probably wouldn't have to keep it around for a long time

Re: HEADS UP: libwebp-0.6.0 soname bumps

2017-02-02 Thread Sandro Mani
On 01.02.2017 18:59, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi I'm about to fire off the libwebp and mingw-libwebp 0.6.0 updates, which include soname bumps. I'm rebuilding all of the dependent packages: A quick status update here on the packages not yet rebuilt: - Packages which are stuck due to depending d

Re: HEADS UP: libwebp-0.6.0 soname bumps

2017-02-02 Thread Kalev Lember
On 02/02/2017 08:12 AM, Kalev Lember wrote: > Hi Sandro, > > Thanks for working on this! The number of packages affected by the > soname bump is quite big though and I think it needs a compat package. > We probably wouldn't have to keep it around for a long time, but maybe > it should be there dur

Re: HEADS UP: libwebp-0.6.0 soname bumps

2017-02-01 Thread Kalev Lember
On 02/01/2017 06:59 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: > Hi > > I'm about to fire off the libwebp and mingw-libwebp 0.6.0 updates, which > include soname bumps. > > I'm rebuilding all of the dependent packages: Hi Sandro, Thanks for working on this! The number of packages affected by the soname bump is qui

Re: HEADS UP: libwebp-0.6.0 soname bumps

2017-02-01 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am 01.02.2017 um 18:59 schrieb Sandro Mani: Hi I'm about to fire off the libwebp and mingw-libwebp 0.6.0 updates, which include soname bumps. I'm rebuilding all of the dependent packages: darktable-2.2.2-1.fc26.src.rpm efl-1.18.4-2.fc26.src.rpm freeimage-3.17.0-8.fc26.src.rpm gd-2.2.4-1.fc26

HEADS UP: libwebp-0.6.0 soname bumps

2017-02-01 Thread Sandro Mani
Hi I'm about to fire off the libwebp and mingw-libwebp 0.6.0 updates, which include soname bumps. I'm rebuilding all of the dependent packages: darktable-2.2.2-1.fc26.src.rpm efl-1.18.4-2.fc26.src.rpm freeimage-3.17.0-8.fc26.src.rpm gd-2.2.4-1.fc26.src.rpm gdal-2.1.2-6.fc26.src.rpm gegl03-0.3