Ben Boeckel wrote:
> With X no longer using HAL for device configuration, what the status of
> completely replacing HAL?
For KDE, according to upstream, we need to wait for at least 4.5, but more
likely 4.6. (Hopefully it will not end up being even longer, like for
Akonadi which will only finall
On 18 April 2010 20:55, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> The wiki states that pm-utils is hal-free. Maybe the hard dep in the RPM needs
> looked at?
Ajax discovered that it pokes HAL in at least two places. We're
waiting for an upstream fix in the meantime.
Richard.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedora
In article <1271556200.29034.1.ca...@localhost> you wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 04:46 +, Ben Boeckel wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> With X no longer using HAL for device configuration, what the status of
>> completely replacing HAL? I know udev, upower, and udisks are destined
>> to replace it, but si
On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 22:03 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 04:46 +, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > With X no longer using HAL for device configuration, what the status of
> > completely replacing HAL? I know udev, upower, and udisks are destined
> > to replace it, bu
On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 04:46 +, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With X no longer using HAL for device configuration, what the status of
> completely replacing HAL? I know udev, upower, and udisks are destined
> to replace it, but since I run a tight setup and HAL is not in the
> "Minimal" install
Hi,
With X no longer using HAL for device configuration, what the status of
completely replacing HAL? I know udev, upower, and udisks are destined
to replace it, but since I run a tight setup and HAL is not in the
"Minimal" install on the F-13 media, I was wondering when a setup
completely without
