Re: GnuPG 2.2.0 and replacement of GnuPG1

2017-09-19 Thread Daniel Walsh
On 09/17/2017 02:12 PM, Brian Exelbierd wrote: On Thu, Sep 7, 2017, at 02:25 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: On Sunday, 03 September 2017 at 13:45, Igor Gnatenko wrote: GnuPG 2.2.0 has --enable-gpg-is-gpg2 which would install compat symlink from /usr/bin/gpg to /usr/bin/gpg2.. Is

Re: GnuPG 2.2.0 and replacement of GnuPG1

2017-09-17 Thread Brian Exelbierd
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017, at 02:25 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Sunday, 03 September 2017 at 13:45, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > GnuPG 2.2.0 has --enable-gpg-is-gpg2 which would install compat symlink > > from /usr/bin/gpg to /usr/bin/gpg2.. > > > > Is it time to retire gnupg (v1) ? >

Re: GnuPG 2.2.0 and replacement of GnuPG1

2017-09-10 Thread David Sommerseth
On 07/09/17 14:25, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Sunday, 03 September 2017 at 13:45, Igor Gnatenko wrote: >> GnuPG 2.2.0 has --enable-gpg-is-gpg2 which would install compat symlink >> from /usr/bin/gpg to /usr/bin/gpg2.. >> >> Is it time to retire gnupg (v1) ? > > hplip still require

Re: GnuPG 2.2.0 and replacement of GnuPG1

2017-09-10 Thread Michael J Gruber
Till Maas venit, vidit, dixit 04.09.2017 18:24: > On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 08:56:31AM +0200, Remi Collet wrote: > >> gnupg v2 is a nightmare for "server", I maintain some PHP extensions and >> libraries which works perfectly against v1, and not against v2 > > Would it be ok for you to patch the li

Re: GnuPG 2.2.0 and replacement of GnuPG1

2017-09-07 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Sunday, 03 September 2017 at 13:45, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > GnuPG 2.2.0 has --enable-gpg-is-gpg2 which would install compat symlink > from /usr/bin/gpg to /usr/bin/gpg2.. > > Is it time to retire gnupg (v1) ? hplip still requires gnupg. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://getfedora.org |

Re: GnuPG 2.2.0 and replacement of GnuPG1

2017-09-04 Thread Igor Gnatenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Mon, 2017-09-04 at 18:15 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 01:45:40PM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > GnuPG 2.2.0 has --enable-gpg-is-gpg2 which would install compat > > symlink > > from /usr/bin/gpg to /usr/bin/gpg2.. > > > > Is

Re: GnuPG 2.2.0 and replacement of GnuPG1

2017-09-04 Thread Till Maas
On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 06:23:27PM +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > On 09/04/2017 06:13 PM, Till Maas wrote: > > You need to add --batch to the command line: > > $ LANG=C date|gpg2 --batch --passphrase aaa -ca | gpg2 --batch > > --passphrase aaa > > gpg: AES encrypted data > > gpg: encrypted with

Re: GnuPG 2.2.0 and replacement of GnuPG1

2017-09-04 Thread Till Maas
On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 08:56:31AM +0200, Remi Collet wrote: > gnupg v2 is a nightmare for "server", I maintain some PHP extensions and > libraries which works perfectly against v1, and not against v2 Would it be ok for you to patch the libraries to use /usr/bin/gpg1 instead? > And, AFAIK, v1 is

Re: GnuPG 2.2.0 and replacement of GnuPG1

2017-09-04 Thread Roberto Ragusa
On 09/04/2017 06:13 PM, Till Maas wrote: > On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 09:23:05AM +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > >> $ date|gpg2 --passphrase aaa -ca >> >> This shows a popup asking me for a passphrase, while it works >> perfectly on gpg v1. > > You need to add --batch to the command line: > $ LANG=C

Re: GnuPG 2.2.0 and replacement of GnuPG1

2017-09-04 Thread Till Maas
On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 01:45:40PM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > GnuPG 2.2.0 has --enable-gpg-is-gpg2 which would install compat symlink > from /usr/bin/gpg to /usr/bin/gpg2.. > > Is it time to retire gnupg (v1) ? It would be great if we could make gpg2 as the default (add symlink from /usr/bin/

Re: GnuPG 2.2.0 and replacement of GnuPG1

2017-09-04 Thread Till Maas
On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 09:23:05AM +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > $ date|gpg2 --passphrase aaa -ca > > This shows a popup asking me for a passphrase, while it works > perfectly on gpg v1. You need to add --batch to the command line: $ LANG=C date|gpg2 --batch --passphrase aaa -ca | gpg2 --batch

Re: GnuPG 2.2.0 and replacement of GnuPG1

2017-09-04 Thread Tomas Mraz
On Sun, 2017-09-03 at 13:45 +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > GnuPG 2.2.0 has --enable-gpg-is-gpg2 which would install compat > symlink >  from /usr/bin/gpg to /usr/bin/gpg2.. > > Is it time to retire gnupg (v1) ? I really do not care. If the gpg v1 is still maintained upstream and there is somebody

Re: GnuPG 2.2.0 and replacement of GnuPG1

2017-09-04 Thread Roberto Ragusa
On 09/04/2017 08:56 AM, Remi Collet wrote: > gnupg v2 is a nightmare for "server", I maintain some PHP extensions and > libraries which works perfectly against v1, and not against v2 > > And, AFAIK, v1 is still maintained. $ date|gpg2 --passphrase aaa -ca This shows a popup asking me for a pass

Re: GnuPG 2.2.0 and replacement of GnuPG1

2017-09-03 Thread Remi Collet
Le 03/09/2017 à 13:45, Igor Gnatenko a écrit : > GnuPG 2.2.0 has --enable-gpg-is-gpg2 which would install compat symlink > from /usr/bin/gpg to /usr/bin/gpg2.. > > Is it time to retire gnupg (v1) ? -1 gnupg v2 is a nightmare for "server", I maintain some PHP extensions and libraries which works

Re: GnuPG 2.2.0 and replacement of GnuPG1

2017-09-03 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Please see the thread from a year or so ago (The last time this came up): https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/LK4OC43LQROZV7NKXADBD3B2BKABOXOD/#LK4OC43LQROZV7NKXADBD3B2BKABOXOD Basically at that time the gnupg1 maintainer said it's still supported up

Re: GnuPG 2.2.0 and replacement of GnuPG1

2017-09-03 Thread Christopher
+1 On Sun, Sep 3, 2017, 07:57 Igor Gnatenko wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > GnuPG 2.2.0 has --enable-gpg-is-gpg2 which would install compat symlink > from /usr/bin/gpg to /usr/bin/gpg2.. > > Is it time to retire gnupg (v1) ? > - -- > - -Igor Gnatenko > -BEGIN

Re: GnuPG 2.2.0 and replacement of GnuPG1

2017-09-03 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 02:24:22PM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > Am 03.09.2017 um 13:45 schrieb Igor Gnatenko: > >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >Hash: SHA256 > > > >GnuPG 2.2.0 has --enable-gpg-is-gpg2 which would install compat symlink > > from /usr/bin/gpg to /usr/bin/gpg2.. > >

Re: GnuPG 2.2.0 and replacement of GnuPG1

2017-09-03 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 7:45 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > GnuPG 2.2.0 has --enable-gpg-is-gpg2 which would install compat symlink > from /usr/bin/gpg to /usr/bin/gpg2.. > > Is it time to retire gnupg (v1) ? IIRC, we've been doing this in Fedora

Re: GnuPG 2.2.0 and replacement of GnuPG1

2017-09-03 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am 03.09.2017 um 13:45 schrieb Igor Gnatenko: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 GnuPG 2.2.0 has --enable-gpg-is-gpg2 which would install compat symlink from /usr/bin/gpg to /usr/bin/gpg2.. Is it time to retire gnupg (v1) ? - -- - -Igor Gnatenko Well, if %{_bindir}/gpg2 is gua

GnuPG 2.2.0 and replacement of GnuPG1

2017-09-03 Thread Igor Gnatenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 GnuPG 2.2.0 has --enable-gpg-is-gpg2 which would install compat symlink from /usr/bin/gpg to /usr/bin/gpg2.. Is it time to retire gnupg (v1) ? - -- - -Igor Gnatenko -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhLFO09aHZVqO+CM6aVcUvRu8X0wFAlmr62Q