Trond Hasle Amundsen wrote:
> Christopher Meng writes:
>
>> Somewhat funny that many users even don't know this tweak tool and ask
>> everywhere about this..
>
> I always found it odd that gnome-tweak-tool even exists.. some
> functionality are found in the system settings, some in
> gnome-tw
Hi
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> I think settings should be made available to the user, but not in a
> half-assed "tweak tool". That's what the settings dialog is for.
>
We understand that is your view point and it is fine to hold that view
point and as a KDE maintain
Martin Sourada wrote:
> I don't think that's what he is trying to tell. I believe it's: either
> expose the setting, or don't have the setting. The middle way is
> broken, be it semi-official tweak tool or even worse "advanced" tab.
> Especially if the tweak tool is for settings that are expected t
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 19:31:42 -0800
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Kevin, you work on a desktop which sufficiently represents your
> views. I think we're all aware that if we want fifteen thousand
> settings in the control panel, we can run KDE. Do you really believe
> you're going to convince the GNOME
On 10/02/13 06:03 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Olav Vitters wrote:
This has been addressed various times. In brief: Advanced buttons do not
work. They'll be clicked every time. Tweak tool provides a different
guarantee of stability. For instance: if you change an option in System
Settings and it resu
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:20:04PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Olav Vitters wrote:
> > PS: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tweak_UI
>
> It was written by one individual employee and released as an unsupported
> tool. It'd have been a third-party tool if the author didn't happen to be an
> M$ emplo
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:18:09PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Olav Vitters wrote:
> > I don't get why you reply to me. It seems anything people do is just
> > bad.
> >
> > No tweak tool: bad
> > A tweak tool: bad
>
> Strawman…
>
> What I actually mean is:
> Completely hidden or absent settings
On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 15:03 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Olav Vitters wrote:
> > This has been addressed various times. In brief: Advanced buttons do not
> > work. They'll be clicked every time. Tweak tool provides a different
> > guarantee of stability. For instance: if you change an option in Sys
I wrote:
> Olav Vitters wrote:
>> I don't get why you reply to me. It seems anything people do is just
>> bad.
>>
>> No tweak tool: bad
>> A tweak tool: bad
>
> Strawman…
>
> What I actually mean is:
> Completely hidden or absent settings ("no tweak tool"): bad
> Settings hidden in a tweak tool
Olav Vitters wrote:
> PS: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tweak_UI
It was written by one individual employee and released as an unsupported
tool. It'd have been a third-party tool if the author didn't happen to be an
M$ employee.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproje
Olav Vitters wrote:
> I don't get why you reply to me. It seems anything people do is just
> bad.
>
> No tweak tool: bad
> A tweak tool: bad
Strawman…
What I actually mean is:
Completely hidden or absent settings ("no tweak tool"): bad
Settings hidden in a tweak tool: bad
Settings available and
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 01:30:29PM +0100, Mario Torre wrote:
> This argument doesn't really work, either.
Care to provide any argumentation? At the moment if that were true, I'd
could just refer to:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_pot_calling_the_kettle_black
But actually I explained myself. You
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 01:30:02PM +0100, Mario Torre wrote:
> Il giorno dom, 10/02/2013 alle 14.47 +0100, Olav Vitters ha scritto:
> > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 01:28:54PM +0100, Trond Hasle Amundsen wrote:
> > > Christopher Meng writes:
> > >
> > > > Somewhat funny that many users even don't know
Il giorno dom, 10/02/2013 alle 14.47 +0100, Olav Vitters ha scritto:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 01:28:54PM +0100, Trond Hasle Amundsen wrote:
> > Christopher Meng writes:
> >
> > > Somewhat funny that many users even don't know this tweak tool and ask
> > > everywhere about this..
> >
> > I a
Il giorno lun, 11/02/2013 alle 11.12 +0100, Olav Vitters ha scritto:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 03:03:44PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Having a separate "tweak tool" is a lame workaround for lack of settings in
> > the official tools. The only reason such "tweak tools" exist on proprietary
> >
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:12:32AM +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 03:03:44PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Having a separate "tweak tool" is a lame workaround for lack of settings in
> > the official tools. The only reason such "tweak tools" exist on proprietary
> > operati
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 03:03:44PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Having a separate "tweak tool" is a lame workaround for lack of settings in
> the official tools. The only reason such "tweak tools" exist on proprietary
> operating systems is because the proprietary companies don't want to
> offic
Olav Vitters writes:
>>> Somewhat funny that many users even don't know this tweak tool and ask
>>> everywhere about this..
>>
>> I always found it odd that gnome-tweak-tool even exists.. some
>> functionality are found in the system settings, some in
>> gnome-tweak-tool. If you ask me, gnom
Olav Vitters wrote:
> This has been addressed various times. In brief: Advanced buttons do not
> work. They'll be clicked every time. Tweak tool provides a different
> guarantee of stability. For instance: if you change an option in System
> Settings and it results in a bug it must be fixed asap. A
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 01:28:54PM +0100, Trond Hasle Amundsen wrote:
> Christopher Meng writes:
>
> > Somewhat funny that many users even don't know this tweak tool and ask
> > everywhere about this..
>
> I always found it odd that gnome-tweak-tool even exists.. some
> functionality are fou
Christopher Meng writes:
> Somewhat funny that many users even don't know this tweak tool and ask
> everywhere about this..
I always found it odd that gnome-tweak-tool even exists.. some
functionality are found in the system settings, some in
gnome-tweak-tool. If you ask me, gnome-tweak-tool
On Sunday, February 10, 2013, Samuel Sieb wrote:
＞ As an aside, when I first saw gnome-shell, I thought it would be horrible
to use. But after a while of using it, finding gnome-tweak-tool, and
installing a couple of extensions, I've been quite happy with it. I
actually think it's more keyboard
On 02/09/2013 03:34 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
1. I no longer use workspaces to manage different tasks unless there
are lots of windows and then I sometimes overflow onto 2. This is
because they're less useful as you now can't switch without going to
the activities view and they aren't segregated well
23 matches
Mail list logo
