On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:47:58PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 22:44 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 09:53:53PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 04:04:30AM +0200, Lars Seipel wrote:
> > > > On Friday, August 26, 2011 04:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:47:58PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 22:44 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 09:53:53PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 04:04:30AM +0200, Lars Seipel wrote:
> > > > On Friday, August 26, 2011 04:
On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 22:44 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 09:53:53PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 04:04:30AM +0200, Lars Seipel wrote:
> > > On Friday, August 26, 2011 04:58:22 PM Al Dunsmuir wrote:
> > > > On systems where 32-bit is XP is runn
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 09:53:53PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 04:04:30AM +0200, Lars Seipel wrote:
> > On Friday, August 26, 2011 04:58:22 PM Al Dunsmuir wrote:
> > > On systems where 32-bit is XP is running, one by definition is running
> > > with a disk of 2 TB or
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 04:04:30AM +0200, Lars Seipel wrote:
> On Friday, August 26, 2011 04:58:22 PM Al Dunsmuir wrote:
> > On systems where 32-bit is XP is running, one by definition is running
> > with a disk of 2 TB or less. Fedora installation must by default do
> > the right thing. We need
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Lars Seipel
wrote:
> btw, I just installed F16 on an EFI machine and got Grub Legacy. Are there any
> major problems with Grub 2's EFI support?
>From a brief conversation I had earlier this week, yes there are. The
plan is grub2 for BIOS based machines, grub for
On Friday, August 26, 2011 04:58:22 PM Al Dunsmuir wrote:
> On systems where 32-bit is XP is running, one by definition is running
> with a disk of 2 TB or less. Fedora installation must by default do
> the right thing. We need to agree on what that happens to be.
On systems with legacy operati
On Friday, August 26, 2011, 3:35:52 PM, Andrew McNabb wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 04:29:55PM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
>>
>> Windows and GPT FAQ:
>>
>> Q. Can Windows 7, Windows Vista, and Windows Server 2008 read, write,
>> and boot from GPT disks?
>>
>> A. Yes, all versions can use GP
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 04:29:55PM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
>
> Windows and GPT FAQ:
>
> Q. Can Windows 7, Windows Vista, and Windows Server 2008 read, write,
> and boot from GPT disks?
>
> A. Yes, all versions can use GPT partitioned disks for data.
>Booting is only supported for 64-bi
On 08/25/2011 08:11 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> To boot to a GPT disk from BIOS (rather than EFI) you need a BIOS boot
> partition. If you use one of the automatic partitioning methods, rather
> than manual partitioning, F16's installer will create one for you. If
> you choose manual partitioning
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 08:12:21PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 21:13 -0500, Andrew McNabb wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 07:17:58PM -0500, David Lehman wrote:
> > >
> > > It's also true that if you create an msdos/mbr partition table on your
> > > disk prior to instal
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 21:13 -0500, Andrew McNabb wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 07:17:58PM -0500, David Lehman wrote:
> >
> > It's also true that if you create an msdos/mbr partition table on your
> > disk prior to installation and then choose any option except for "Use
> > All Space" (or "clear
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 07:17:58PM -0500, David Lehman wrote:
>
> It's also true that if you create an msdos/mbr partition table on your
> disk prior to installation and then choose any option except for "Use
> All Space" (or "clearpart --all" in kickstart) anaconda will not destroy
> your existin
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 17:11 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 16:17 -0600, Andrew McNabb wrote:
> > While installing Fedora 16 Alpha, I ran into some problems that turned
> > out to be caused by the installer formatting with a GPT rather than an
> > MBR partition table.
> >
> >
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 16:17 -0600, Andrew McNabb wrote:
> While installing Fedora 16 Alpha, I ran into some problems that turned
> out to be caused by the installer formatting with a GPT rather than an
> MBR partition table.
>
> I would like to understand the change and its implications, and I hav
While installing Fedora 16 Alpha, I ran into some problems that turned
out to be caused by the installer formatting with a GPT rather than an
MBR partition table.
I would like to understand the change and its implications, and I have
unsuccessfully tried to track down more information. I haven't
16 matches
Mail list logo
