On Mon, 2017-09-11 at 13:06 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 09/11/2017 10:49 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > Why the updated version of gjs 1.49 was not released yet? F27+ users
> > apparently still fight gjs crashes:
>
> It needs mozjs52 that we don't have in Fedora yet.
Well, also, we're in Beta fre
Reported: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490351
I am thinking about proposing this as Blocker Bug/PrioritizedBug, it's
pretty significant regression compared to current state on Fedora 26.
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 09/11/2017 10:49 AM, Vít Ondruch
On 09/11/2017 10:49 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Why the updated version of gjs 1.49 was not released yet? F27+ users
> apparently still fight gjs crashes:
It needs mozjs52 that we don't have in Fedora yet.
--
Kalev
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fe
Why the updated version of gjs 1.49 was not released yet? F27+ users
apparently still fight gjs crashes:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1456293
Vít
Dne 5.9.2017 v 16:02 Kalev Lember napsal(a):
> Hi all,
>
> It's GNOME 3.25.92 release this week, which is going to be quickly
> follo
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Kalev Lember wrote:
>
>> I
>> can add the triggers to KDE and other themes as well if their
>> maintainers are fine with it. rdieter?
>
> If you don't mind, please do, thanks.
Looking closer, I'm curious why you chose to go with:
%transfiletriggerin -- %{_datadir}/icons/hic
On 2017-09-06 13:16, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 14:02 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
>> On 09/06/2017 01:22 PM, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
>>> [tkloczko@domek SPECS.fedora]$ grep filetrigger * | grep icons
>>> adwaita-icon-theme.spec:%transfiletriggerin --
>>> %{_datadir}/icons/Adwaita
>
Kalev Lember wrote:
> I
> can add the triggers to KDE and other themes as well if their
> maintainers are fine with it. rdieter?
If you don't mind, please do, thanks.
-- Rex
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On 6 September 2017 at 03:16, Rex Dieter wrote:
> [..]
>>> It would be good to start remove on this cycle execution of all
>>> glib-compile-schemas, gtk-update-icon-cache and
>>> update-desktop-database from all %post/%postun as all necessary
>>> changes are done over rpm
On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 14:02 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 09/06/2017 01:22 PM, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> > [tkloczko@domek SPECS.fedora]$ grep filetrigger * | grep icons
> > adwaita-icon-theme.spec:%transfiletriggerin --
> > %{_datadir}/icons/Adwaita
> > adwaita-icon-theme.spec:%transfiletriggerpos
On 6 September 2017 at 13:02, Kalev Lember wrote:
[..]
> > Seems like packages installing other themes *already* are doing exactly
> > what I've been thinking that they should be doing so updating per icon
> > theme strategy should be OK.
>
> Right, I added file triggers to all gnome-related icon
On 09/06/2017 01:22 PM, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> [tkloczko@domek SPECS.fedora]$ grep filetrigger * | grep icons
> adwaita-icon-theme.spec:%transfiletriggerin -- %{_datadir}/icons/Adwaita
> adwaita-icon-theme.spec:%transfiletriggerpostun -- %{_datadir}/icons/Adwaita
> gnome-icon-theme.spec:%transfile
On 6 September 2017 at 09:32, Neal Gompa wrote:
[..]
> I think we implemented file triggers in Mageia for this, I'll need to
> do some checking. I know that we're pretty aggressive on package,
> transaction, and file trigger usage compared to Fedora... Heck, we
> don't even need ldconfig runs in M
On 6 September 2017 at 11:43, Tomasz Kłoczko
wrote:
[..]
> 3) As long as hicolor theme is default theme updating its cache can
> still be in gtk-update-icon-cache package.
>
> What happens with other directories than /usr/share/icons/hicolor is
> in this case secondary and can be treated as an ex
On 6 September 2017 at 09:24, Björn 'besser82' Esser
wrote:
[..]
> That is NOT true for gtk-update-icon-cache. There is currently no trigger
> for it, at least when I look at the recent information on the wiki [1].
OK. Just started working on add this (I see a lot other things which
can be impro
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:24 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser
wrote:
> Am 06.09.2017 um 09:51 schrieb Tomasz Kłoczko:
>>
>> On 6 September 2017 at 03:16, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> [..]
It would be good to start remove on this cycle execution of all
glib-compile-schemas, gtk-update-icon-cache a
Am 06.09.2017 um 09:51 schrieb Tomasz Kłoczko:
On 6 September 2017 at 03:16, Rex Dieter wrote:
[..]
It would be good to start remove on this cycle execution of all
glib-compile-schemas, gtk-update-icon-cache and
update-desktop-database from all %post/%postun as all necessary
changes are done o
On 6 September 2017 at 03:16, Rex Dieter wrote:
[..]
>> It would be good to start remove on this cycle execution of all
>> glib-compile-schemas, gtk-update-icon-cache and
>> update-desktop-database from all %post/%postun as all necessary
>> changes are done over rpm triggers.
>> All this stuff on
Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On 5 September 2017 at 15:02, Kalev Lember wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> It's GNOME 3.25.92 release this week, which is going to be
>> quicklynecessary chaith all followed by final 3.26.0 next week.
>
> It would be good to start remove on this cycle execution of all
> glib-comp
On 5 September 2017 at 15:02, Kalev Lember wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It's GNOME 3.25.92 release this week, which is going to be quicklynecessary
> chaith all
> followed by final 3.26.0 next week.
It would be good to start remove on this cycle execution of all
glib-compile-schemas, gtk-update-icon-cac
Hi all,
It's GNOME 3.25.92 release this week, which is going to be quickly
followed by final 3.26.0 next week.
To help prepare the updates, we have a f27-gnome side tag / build target
for Fedora 27 as usual. If you are helping with the builds, please use
'fedpkg build --target f27-gnome' for F27,
20 matches
Mail list logo
