Re: GIMP vs. poppler licensing, was: So you want to test an unstable GIMP...

2011-09-05 Thread Nils Philippsen
On Sat, 2011-09-03 at 23:17 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Nils Philippsen wrote: > > Legal question: is it better to put this in its own subpackage to be > > able to specify this individual license, or would GIMP better have > > "GPLv3+ and LGPLv3+ and (GPLv2 or GPLv3)" as its license? > > Not an a

Re: GIMP vs. poppler licensing, was: So you want to test an unstable GIMP...

2011-09-03 Thread Kevin Kofler
Nils Philippsen wrote: > Legal question: is it better to put this in its own subpackage to be > able to specify this individual license, or would GIMP better have > "GPLv3+ and LGPLv3+ and (GPLv2 or GPLv3)" as its license? Not an actual answer to your question, but wouldn't the license of the PDF

Re: GIMP vs. poppler licensing, was: So you want to test an unstable GIMP...

2011-09-01 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 21:24 +0100, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote: > > > Legal question: is it better to put this in its own subpackage to be > > > able to specify this individual license, or would GIMP better have > > > "GPLv3+ and LGPLv3+ and (GPLv2 or GPLv3)" as its license? > > > > if you combin

Re: GIMP vs. poppler licensing, was: So you want to test an unstable GIMP...

2011-09-01 Thread Dr Andrew John Hughes
On 14:50 Thu 01 Sep , Simo Sorce wrote: > On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 20:42 +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote: > > It seems one always forgets something... well, better this than leaving > > the stove on. > > > > On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 12:45 +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote: > > > Here's the gist (in no parti

Re: [Fedora-legal-list] GIMP vs. poppler licensing, was: So you want to test an unstable GIMP...

2011-09-01 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "NP" == Nils Philippsen writes: NP> Legal question: is it better to put this in its own subpackage to be NP> able to specify this individual license, or would GIMP better have NP> "GPLv3+ and LGPLv3+ and (GPLv2 or GPLv3)" as its license? This is covered by http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Pac

Re: GIMP vs. poppler licensing, was: So you want to test an unstable GIMP...

2011-09-01 Thread Simo Sorce
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 20:42 +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote: > It seems one always forgets something... well, better this than leaving > the stove on. > > On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 12:45 +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote: > > Here's the gist (in no particular order): > > - GIMP 2.7 and later is licensed as "

GIMP vs. poppler licensing, was: So you want to test an unstable GIMP...

2011-09-01 Thread Nils Philippsen
It seems one always forgets something... well, better this than leaving the stove on. On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 12:45 +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote: > Here's the gist (in no particular order): - GIMP 2.7 and later is licensed as "GPLv3+ and LGPLv3+" (executables, libraries) - This makes it incompatibl