Re: GCC __cplusplus definition on rawhide and ciso646

2025-01-29 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 02:38:45AM +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Applied , thank you . > > libphonenumber [1] doesn't build on rawhide because treats this warning > as errors > > abseil-cpp-20240722.1 also have one header that emit this king of > warning. > > in absl/hash/internal/hash.h line 3

Re: GCC __cplusplus definition on rawhide and ciso646

2025-01-28 Thread Ben Beasley
I think that -Werror makes sense for upstream development CI with controlled dependencies and toolchains, but it is too strict and brittle for downstream packaging, because insignificant warnings from new toolchain or dependency versions tend to cause frequent unnecessary breakage. The more com

Re: GCC __cplusplus definition on rawhide and ciso646

2025-01-28 Thread Sérgio Basto via devel
On Tue, 2025-01-28 at 10:06 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 07:31:35PM +, Sérgio Basto via devel > wrote: > > I just want check, if I'm thinking correctly before submitting a > > fix in > > gtest package > > > > The problem is on Rawhide I have this warning that make oth