Re: GCC 4.6 related common package rebuild failures (was Re: mass rebuild status)

2011-02-09 Thread Benjamin Kosnik
> Here are some common errors. Please try to fix the issues rather than > adding workaround flags like -fpermissive, > -Wno-unused-but-set-variable etc. Benjamin, do you plan to write > http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.6/porting_to.html? This could serve as > partial source for that page. I will absolut

Re: GCC 4.6 related common package rebuild failures (was Re: mass rebuild status)

2011-02-09 Thread John Reiser
> -Werror=unused-but-set-variable > In some cases (often from > macro expansion) you just want to keep such unused variables > around. You can in that case just cast them to void, > or add __attribute__((__unused__)) to them. Some code employ

GCC 4.6 related common package rebuild failures (was Re: mass rebuild status)

2011-02-09 Thread Jakub Jelinek
Hi! On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 06:23:57PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > so the mass rebuild is 24 hours in we have completed ~45% of the builds and > are at 365 packages failed to build the total number of builds in the mass > rebuild is 10404 we are churning along nicely. i expect to complete the