On 23/09/21 16:30, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Mattia Verga via devel wrote on 2021/09/23 15:11:
>> I've created f35-build-side-46123 and tagged fpc-3.2.2-3.fc35 into that.
>>
>> Lazarus rebuild is in progress. I will take care of rebuilding the other
>> packages listed in bug 1987485 as soon as I can.
Mattia Verga via devel wrote on 2021/09/23 15:11:
I've created f35-build-side-46123 and tagged fpc-3.2.2-3.fc35 into that.
Lazarus rebuild is in progress. I will take care of rebuilding the other
packages listed in bug 1987485 as soon as I can. If the maintainers of
those packages want to rebuil
> I've created f35-build-side-46123 and tagged fpc-3.2.2-3.fc35 into that.
> Lazarus rebuild is in progress.
Thanks. Lazarus has been built successfully.
> If the maintainers of those packages want to rebuild their package
> (in the side-tag), please do so, it will speed up the process.
I'll go ov
I've created f35-build-side-46123 and tagged fpc-3.2.2-3.fc35 into that.
Lazarus rebuild is in progress. I will take care of rebuilding the other
packages listed in bug 1987485 as soon as I can. If the maintainers of
those packages want to rebuild their package (in the side-tag), please
do so, it
> I can take care of creating the side-tag,
> tagging the fpc build in it (no need to rebuild it again)
> and trying to rebuild all dependent packages there.
Sure, thanks for the help.
A.FI.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To uns
On 22/09/21 12:47, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote:
> The build for f35 was successful:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1835338
> I've submitted an update to bodhi as well:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-032397269f
>
> Although now that I think of it, it
The build for f35 was successful:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1835338
I've submitted an update to bodhi as well:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-032397269f
Although now that I think of it, it probably would've been cleaner to do create
a side tag, p
On Tue, 21 Sep 2021 12:19:10 -
"Artur Frenszek-Iwicki" wrote:
> The build was successful:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=76057984
> I see you've made a commit to the rawhide branch only; I'll go ahead and
> apply the patch to the f35 branch as well.
yes, please
> T
The build was successful:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=76057984
I see you've made a commit to the rawhide branch only; I'll go ahead and apply
the patch to the f35 branch as well.
Thanks for the help. The patch doesn't look complicated, but unfortunately I
have zero exper
On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 19:37:21 +0200
Dan Horák wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 18:34:44 +0200
> Dan Horák wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 18:15:44 +0200
> > Florian Weimer wrote:
> >
> > > * Dan Horák:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:36:33 -
> > > > "Artur Frenszek-Iwicki" wrote:
> > >
* Dan Horák:
> Florian, can the patch go upstream as it is or are there any side
> effects when the resulting binary would run on system with glibc < 2.34?
ELF constructors for the main program will not run on glibc < 2.34.
But I don't think there will be immediate crashes.
Whether the missing E
On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 18:34:44 +0200
Dan Horák wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 18:15:44 +0200
> Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> > * Dan Horák:
> >
> > > On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:36:33 -
> > > "Artur Frenszek-Iwicki" wrote:
> > >
> > >> Back in July, during the F35 Mass Rebuild, the Free Pascal Compile
On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 18:15:44 +0200
Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Dan Horák:
>
> > On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:36:33 -
> > "Artur Frenszek-Iwicki" wrote:
> >
> >> Back in July, during the F35 Mass Rebuild, the Free Pascal Compiler
> >> package failed to build [1] because of linking issues on aarch64
* Dan Horák:
> On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:36:33 -
> "Artur Frenszek-Iwicki" wrote:
>
>> Back in July, during the F35 Mass Rebuild, the Free Pascal Compiler package
>> failed to build [1] because of linking issues on aarch64, i686 and ppc64le,
>> related to the new glibc 2.34. x86_64 and arm we
On 20/09/21 15:36, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote:
> In order to avoid retiring FPC (and all the other dependent packages) from
> Fedora due to the FTBFS issue, we want to temporarily disable support for the
> failing architectures (aarch64, i686 and ppc64le), leaving only the working
> ones (arm
We'll remove these from %{fpc_arches} so that dependent packages can rebuild
without requiring changes to spec files.
A.FI.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedor
Should i disabled myself this arches for Goverlay or you add them into
`ExclusiveArch: %{fpc_arches}` and rebuild affected packages yourself? Thanks.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lis
On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:36:33 -
"Artur Frenszek-Iwicki" wrote:
> Back in July, during the F35 Mass Rebuild, the Free Pascal Compiler package
> failed to build [1] because of linking issues on aarch64, i686 and ppc64le,
> related to the new glibc 2.34. x86_64 and arm we unaffected, however.
>
Back in July, during the F35 Mass Rebuild, the Free Pascal Compiler package
failed to build [1] because of linking issues on aarch64, i686 and ppc64le,
related to the new glibc 2.34. x86_64 and arm we unaffected, however.
This was discussed briefly here on devel in thread [2]. The issue was submi
19 matches
Mail list logo
