It has been 8 days since the FontAwesome 6 Change side tag was
created. Some of the packages built into that side tag have since
been rebuilt for Rawhide, causing them to break. To fix that
breakage, the side tag has been merged into Rawhide.
The following PRs have still not been merged, so
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 10:09 AM Jonathan Wright wrote:
> I just retired python-acme this morning in F38/39. It's now built by the
> certbot package.
Great, thank you for letting me know.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list
6/
> > for builds of affected packages. All changes have been checked into
> > my forks of the affected packages (username "jjames"). Here's a quick
> > rundown of the changes.
>
> The FontAwesome 6 Change proposal was accepted. I have created a side
> tag,
an update on where things
> stand. See https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jjames/FontAwesome6/
> for builds of affected packages. All changes have been checked into
> my forks of the affected packages (username "jjames"). Here's a quick
> rundown of the changes.
T
/TeX font pairs, and this wasn't done for them.
It wasn't even done for the texlive-fontawesome5 subpackage.
What remains to be done
------
The way the FontAwesome 6.x subpackages are split up seems to be
suboptimal. First, nothing in Fedora wants ju
On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 03:35:14PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 8:24 AM Matthew Miller
> wrote:
> > This is particulary nice for Fedora, since v6 includes our new logo!
> Great! Do you happen to be a web developer, or play one on TV? :-)
I have a hand-coded html personal w
On pe, 04 marras 2022, Jerry James wrote:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 1:37 AM Matthias Runge wrote:
As a former contributor to those packages, your assumption is correct.
python-XStatic-Font-Awesome can go away; I'll sync with Radomir on that
note.
Great! One less package for me to worry about. :
On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 8:24 AM Matthew Miller wrote:
> This is particulary nice for Fedora, since v6 includes our new logo!
Great! Do you happen to be a web developer, or play one on TV? :-)
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing li
On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 1:37 AM Matthias Runge wrote:
> As a former contributor to those packages, your assumption is correct.
> python-XStatic-Font-Awesome can go away; I'll sync with Radomir on that
> note.
Great! One less package for me to worry about. :-)
> If someone relies on fontawesome-f
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 12:23:02PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> package. Version 6.x has backwards compatibility helpers for both 4.x
> and 5.x, so I would like to see fontawesome-fonts upgraded to 6.x and
> the fontawesome5-fonts package retired. There are a few hurdles to
This is particulary ni
r package releases. Three options:
- just update fontaweseome-fonts; that'll unblock folks who are waiting
for the update; unfortunately packages may not be ready for
fontawesome-6 and may have to be fixed (or removed)
- provide a compatibility package; that would require to touch more
p
Hi all,
I would like to update the python-pydata-sphinx-theme package to its
latest version, but it needs FontAwesome 6.x. We currently have 4.x
in the fontawesome-fonts package and 5.x in the fontawesome5-fonts
package. Version 6.x has backwards compatibility helpers for both 4.x
and 5.x, so I
12 matches
Mail list logo
