Dne 4.11.2014 v 12:37 Martin Stransky napsal(a):
> The Gtk3 Firefox is enabled for master (Fedora 22) now. If you'd like
> to have gtk3 build for other distros, just change the toolkit_gtk3
> variable and rebuild (locally, in copr).
>
> I'd be glad for any feedback/bugreport and please mind - it's
IMO It would be great if anyone can step in, rebuild the gtk3 package
for other Fedora's and maintain the copr repo. I can help with any
issues with that so feel free to ask.
ma.
On 11/04/2014 12:37 PM, Martin Stransky wrote:
The Gtk3 Firefox is enabled for master (Fedora 22) now. If you'd li
The Gtk3 Firefox is enabled for master (Fedora 22) now. If you'd like to
have gtk3 build for other distros, just change the toolkit_gtk3 variable
and rebuild (locally, in copr).
I'd be glad for any feedback/bugreport and please mind - it's still
"rawhide" :)
ma.
On 01/13/2014 04:15 PM, Mart
On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 12:27 +0200, Martin Stransky wrote:
> So the Firefox-gtk3 may be slowly moved
> to the Fedora one.
Martin,
Can I request you to please provide f21 packages in the copr too?
--
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur (FranciscoD)
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Join Fe
On 09/03/2014 09:58 AM, Kẏra wrote:
Testing has been great! I still really appreciate this repo. There have been
a few firefox releases plus Fedora 21 is no longer rawhide so that could use
its own repo. Any plans to update soon?
I've been able to find these two bugs (though I haven't been able
Martin Stransky redhat.com> writes:
>
> On 06/09/2014 09:04 PM, Kẏra wrote:
> >>
> >> cool! can you link to bugs / review pages for those patches so that we can
> >> track their progress? updating the build to FF31 also sounds great [=
> >
> > FF31 is out of nightly and FF32 has already been the
On 06/09/2014 09:04 PM, Kẏra wrote:
On that note, I haven't seen a new build in a while! When can we hope for
an update?
There are some patches waiting upstream for review so when those are
done. I'd like also update the firefox-gtk3 build to Firefox 31.
cool! can you link to bugs / review p
Kẏra riseup.net> writes:
> Martin Stransky redhat.com> writes:
> > On 03/28/2014 11:44 AM, Kẏra wrote:
> > > First off, thank you so much for this! I have been using it and it is
> > > stunning. The difference is huge.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > > One thing that I have been waiting for is separate
Kẏra riseup.net> writes:
> Martin Stransky redhat.com> writes:
>
> > How do you enable it? Can you file a BZ# for that at bugzilla.redhat.com?
>
> In about:config, set the browser.tabs.remote preference to 'true'
>
> More info here: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Electrolysis
>
> did you mean the m
Martin Stransky redhat.com> writes:
>
> On 03/28/2014 11:44 AM, Kẏra wrote:
> > First off, thank you so much for this! I have been using it and it is
> > stunning. The difference is huge.
>
> Thanks!
>
> > It also seems to be the only browser that has supported my HiDPI display
> > (perhaps th
On 03/28/2014 11:44 AM, Kẏra wrote:
First off, thank you so much for this! I have been using it and it is
stunning. The difference is huge.
Thanks!
It also seems to be the only browser that has supported my HiDPI display
(perhaps that's thanks to gtk3?).
That's a great news, I was not aware
Martin Stransky redhat.com> writes:
>
> On 01/13/2014 04:16 PM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Martin Stransky
redhat.com> wrote:
> >> Hi guys,
> >>
> >> first $SUBJ is available at:
> >>
> >> http://stransky.fedorapeople.org/FirefoxGtk3/
> >>
> >> It's just a src
On 01/28/2014 10:59 AM, Maros Zatko wrote:
On 01/16/2014 12:54 PM, Martin Stransky wrote:
On 01/14/2014 07:12 PM, Maros Zatko wrote:
On 01/14/2014 03:38 PM, H. Guémar wrote:
What's the point ?
Personally, it's mainly about not throwing gnome 3 HIG at people.
There's absolutely no benefit in
On 01/16/2014 12:54 PM, Martin Stransky wrote:
On 01/14/2014 07:12 PM, Maros Zatko wrote:
On 01/14/2014 03:38 PM, H. Guémar wrote:
What's the point ?
Personally, it's mainly about not throwing gnome 3 HIG at people.
There's absolutely no benefit in keeping Gtk+2 longer.
Gtk+ 2.24.0 has been r
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:15:19 +0100
Martin Stransky wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> first $SUBJ is available at:
>
> http://stransky.fedorapeople.org/FirefoxGtk3/
>
> It's just a src.spm and plugin support it not finished (don't browse
> youtube ;-)) but may work as a preview.
>
Aside:
Listening to \v
Am 17.01.2014 01:32, schrieb Michael Catanzaro:
> On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 20:18 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> personally if a GTK user does not want GTK3 i want a pure
>> QT firefox to get rid of GTK-dialogs
>>
>> i know that will not happen, but on the KDE desktop *any* GTK2 or GTK3
>> application
On 01/16/2014 08:19 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Qui, 2014-01-16 at 12:47 +0100, Martin Stransky wrote:
New builds are available at copr [1]. Package firefox-gtk3-29.0-3
contains working NPAPI plugin support, so flash and other should work there.
Please report any issue to bugzila (firefox compon
On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 20:18 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> personally if a GTK user does not want GTK3 i want a pure
> QT firefox to get rid of GTK-dialogs
>
> i know that will not happen, but on the KDE desktop *any* GTK2 or GTK3
> application is much more disturbing as the difference GTK2/GTK3
W
On Qui, 2014-01-16 at 12:47 +0100, Martin Stransky wrote:
> New builds are available at copr [1]. Package firefox-gtk3-29.0-3
> contains working NPAPI plugin support, so flash and other should work there.
>
> Please report any issue to bugzila (firefox component) and note it's the
> gtk3 port.
On Qui, 2014-01-16 at 12:47 +0100, Martin Stransky wrote:
> contains working NPAPI plugin support,
That is a good new,
about drop gtk 1 , IIRC gtk 1 just exit because someone want maintain
xmms in Fedora .
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fed
On 01/16/2014 01:04 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 16.01.2014 12:56, schrieb Martin Stransky:
On 01/14/2014 08:18 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.01.2014 19:12, schrieb Maros Zatko:
On 01/14/2014 03:38 PM, H. Guémar wrote:
What's the point ?
Personally, it's mainly about not throwing gnome 3 H
Am 16.01.2014 12:56, schrieb Martin Stransky:
> On 01/14/2014 08:18 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 14.01.2014 19:12, schrieb Maros Zatko:
>>> On 01/14/2014 03:38 PM, H. Guémar wrote:
What's the point ?
>>> Personally, it's mainly about not throwing gnome 3 HIG at people
>>
>> personally
On 01/14/2014 08:18 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.01.2014 19:12, schrieb Maros Zatko:
On 01/14/2014 03:38 PM, H. Guémar wrote:
What's the point ?
Personally, it's mainly about not throwing gnome 3 HIG at people
personally if a GTK user does not want GTK3 i want a pure
QT firefox to get ri
On 01/14/2014 07:12 PM, Maros Zatko wrote:
On 01/14/2014 03:38 PM, H. Guémar wrote:
What's the point ?
Personally, it's mainly about not throwing gnome 3 HIG at people.
There's absolutely no benefit in keeping Gtk+2 longer.
Gtk+ 2.24.0 has been released 3 years ago (january, 2011) and is only
On 01/14/2014 06:31 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Is it possible to split the NSAPI components out into a sub package
and hence remove the dependence on gtk2 for those people that don't
use NSAPI plugins?
You can build your own package at copr. We can add some config flags to
firefox spec to make
New builds are available at copr [1]. Package firefox-gtk3-29.0-3
contains working NPAPI plugin support, so flash and other should work there.
Please report any issue to bugzila (firefox component) and note it's the
gtk3 port.
Thanks!
ma.
[1] http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/stransky/Fire
Am 14.01.2014 19:12, schrieb Maros Zatko:
> On 01/14/2014 03:38 PM, H. Guémar wrote:
>> What's the point ?
> Personally, it's mainly about not throwing gnome 3 HIG at people
personally if a GTK user does not want GTK3 i want a pure
QT firefox to get rid of GTK-dialogs
i know that will not happe
On 01/14/2014 03:38 PM, H. Guémar wrote:
What's the point ?
Personally, it's mainly about not throwing gnome 3 HIG at people.
There's absolutely no benefit in keeping Gtk+2 longer.
Gtk+ 2.24.0 has been released 3 years ago (january, 2011) and is only
receiving bugfix due to existing apps who d
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> H. Guémar wrote:
>>
>> What's the point ? There's absolutely no benefit in keeping Gtk+2 longer.
>> Gtk+ 2.24.0 has been released 3 years ago (january, 2011) and is only
>> receiving
>> bugfix due to existing apps who didn't move to Gtk
Am 14.01.2014 15:59, schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 08:49:05AM -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>> H. Guémar wrote:
>>> What's the point ? There's absolutely no benefit in keeping Gtk+2 longer.
>>> Gtk+ 2.24.0 has been released 3 years ago (january, 2011) and is only
>>> re
On 01/13/2014 04:16 PM, Christopher Meng wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Martin Stransky wrote:
Hi guys,
first $SUBJ is available at:
http://stransky.fedorapeople.org/FirefoxGtk3/
It's just a src.spm and plugin support it not finished (don't browse youtube
;-)) but may work as a pre
2014/1/14 Daniel P. Berrange
>
> In fact Fedora still ships GTK *1*. If we can't even get rid of GTK1,
> then talk of killing GTK2 seems wildly over optimistic.
>
> Regards,
> Daniel
>
I'll quote myself again: "at least from base images" , not removing it from
repositories.
H.
--
devel mailing
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 08:49:05AM -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> H. Guémar wrote:
> >What's the point ? There's absolutely no benefit in keeping Gtk+2 longer.
> >Gtk+ 2.24.0 has been released 3 years ago (january, 2011) and is only
> >receiving
> >bugfix due to existing apps who didn't move
H. Guémar wrote:
What's the point ? There's absolutely no benefit in keeping Gtk+2 longer.
Gtk+ 2.24.0 has been released 3 years ago (january, 2011) and is only receiving
bugfix due to existing apps who didn't move to Gtk+3.
By migrating more apps, we can drop Gtk+ 2.24 (at least from images), fi
On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 15:22:52 +0100
Maros Zatko wrote:
> > [1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=627699
> What can do users who doesn't want that gtk3 port?
> For some users reasoning that "it works better in gnome-shell" is
> just not enough.
>
I don't use Gnome, works fine in Xfce (F
What's the point ? There's absolutely no benefit in keeping Gtk+2 longer.
Gtk+ 2.24.0 has been released 3 years ago (january, 2011) and is only
receiving bugfix due to existing apps who didn't move to Gtk+3.
By migrating more apps, we can drop Gtk+ 2.24 (at least from images),
firefox is one of the
On 01/13/2014 04:49 PM, Martin Stransky wrote:
On 01/13/2014 04:41 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
I don't say it's important/newsworthy. It's just FYI. Please ignore if
you're not interested.
Ok, I'll rephrase.
I'm interested but I have no idea how this is different from every
other Firefox build that
Am 14.01.2014 13:18, schrieb Martin Stransky:
> On 01/13/2014 09:33 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> [...]
>
>>> It's the same as the gtk2 package, gstreamer support does not depend on
>>> toolkit. IIRC the test package has gstreamer enabled as well as the latest
>>> official Fedora Firefox builds.
>
On 01/13/2014 09:33 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
[...]
It's the same as the gtk2 package, gstreamer support does not depend on
toolkit. IIRC the test package has gstreamer enabled as well as the latest
official Fedora Firefox builds.
It was said in bug [1] comment 9 that it wouldn't be enabled un
On 01/13/2014 09:04 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 13.01.2014 20:50, schrieb Martin Stransky:
On 01/13/2014 05:57 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Martin Stransky wrote:
On 01/13/2014 04:41 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
I don't say it's important/newsworthy. It's just FYI.
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
>
> Le Lun 13 janvier 2014 21:33, drago01 a écrit :
>
>> No it cannot. Most of this flash implemenations only work to play
>> flash you don't want anyway (i.e ads).
>
> Unfortunately I've found out a lot of companies that grew around brick a
Le Lun 13 janvier 2014 21:33, drago01 a écrit :
> No it cannot. Most of this flash implemenations only work to play
> flash you don't want anyway (i.e ads).
Unfortunately I've found out a lot of companies that grew around brick and
mortar distribution only describe their products in flashified v
>>> Ahh, Okay. The package is build with Gtk3 toolkit [1] (the recent
>>> official
>>> ones are Gtk2) so it's a regular Gtk3 app which should better fit to
>>> Gnome 3
>>> desktop, use themes/skins and so.
>>>
>>> The long term plan is to switch Fedora Firefox to Gtk3 so this is just a
>>> tech pre
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 9:22 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Seg, 2014-01-13 at 16:53 +0100, Martin Stransky wrote:
>> On 01/13/2014 04:48 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > Am 13.01.2014 16:41, schrieb Josh Boyer:
>> >> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Martin Stransky
>> >> wrote:
>> >>> On
On Seg, 2014-01-13 at 16:53 +0100, Martin Stransky wrote:
> On 01/13/2014 04:48 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> >
> > Am 13.01.2014 16:41, schrieb Josh Boyer:
> >> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Martin Stransky
> >> wrote:
> >>> On 01/13/2014 04:29 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> On Mon, J
Am 13.01.2014 20:50, schrieb Martin Stransky:
> On 01/13/2014 05:57 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Martin Stransky wrote:
>>> On 01/13/2014 04:41 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> I don't say it's important/newsworthy. It's just FYI. Please ignore if
> you're n
On 01/13/2014 05:57 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Martin Stransky wrote:
On 01/13/2014 04:41 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
I don't say it's important/newsworthy. It's just FYI. Please ignore if
you're not interested.
Ok, I'll rephrase.
I'm interested but I have no ide
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Martin Stransky wrote:
> On 01/13/2014 04:41 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't say it's important/newsworthy. It's just FYI. Please ignore if
>>> you're not interested.
>>
>>
>> Ok, I'll rephrase.
>>
>> I'm interested but I have no idea how this is different fr
On 01/13/2014 04:55 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:49:09 +0100
Martin Stransky wrote:
Ahh, Okay. The package is build with Gtk3 toolkit [1] (the recent
official ones are Gtk2) so it's a regular Gtk3 app which should
better fit to Gnome 3 desktop, use themes/skins and so.
I h
Am 13.01.2014 16:55, schrieb Frank Murphy:
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:49:09 +0100
> Martin Stransky wrote:
>
>> Ahh, Okay. The package is build with Gtk3 toolkit [1] (the recent
>> official ones are Gtk2) so it's a regular Gtk3 app which should
>> better fit to Gnome 3 desktop, use themes/skins an
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:49:09 +0100
Martin Stransky wrote:
> Ahh, Okay. The package is build with Gtk3 toolkit [1] (the recent
> official ones are Gtk2) so it's a regular Gtk3 app which should
> better fit to Gnome 3 desktop, use themes/skins and so.
>
I have Xfce but is it ok to test it?
If it
On 01/13/2014 04:48 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 13.01.2014 16:41, schrieb Josh Boyer:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
On 01/13/2014 04:29 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Martin Stransky
wrote:
Hi guys,
first $SUBJ is available at:
http:/
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
> On 01/13/2014 04:41 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't say it's important/newsworthy. It's just FYI. Please ignore if
>>> you're not interested.
>>
>>
>> Ok, I'll rephrase.
>>
>> I'm interested but I have no idea how this is different f
On 01/13/2014 04:41 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
I don't say it's important/newsworthy. It's just FYI. Please ignore if
you're not interested.
Ok, I'll rephrase.
I'm interested but I have no idea how this is different from every
other Firefox build that Fedora provides. Could you elaborate on the
ch
Am 13.01.2014 16:41, schrieb Josh Boyer:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
>> On 01/13/2014 04:29 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Martin Stransky
>>> wrote:
Hi guys,
first $SUBJ is available at:
http://stransky.fe
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
> On 01/13/2014 04:29 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Martin Stransky
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> first $SUBJ is available at:
>>>
>>> http://stransky.fedorapeople.org/FirefoxGtk3/
>>>
>>> It's just a sr
On 01/13/2014 04:29 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
Hi guys,
first $SUBJ is available at:
http://stransky.fedorapeople.org/FirefoxGtk3/
It's just a src.spm and plugin support it not finished (don't browse youtube
;-)) but may work as a preview.
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> first $SUBJ is available at:
>
> http://stransky.fedorapeople.org/FirefoxGtk3/
>
> It's just a src.spm and plugin support it not finished (don't browse youtube
> ;-)) but may work as a preview.
>
> I'll provide Fedora builds a
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Martin Stransky wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> first $SUBJ is available at:
>
> http://stransky.fedorapeople.org/FirefoxGtk3/
>
> It's just a src.spm and plugin support it not finished (don't browse youtube
> ;-)) but may work as a preview.
>
> I'll provide Fedora builds a
Hi guys,
first $SUBJ is available at:
http://stransky.fedorapeople.org/FirefoxGtk3/
It's just a src.spm and plugin support it not finished (don't browse
youtube ;-)) but may work as a preview.
I'll provide Fedora builds and repo later.
ma.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
60 matches
Mail list logo
