On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 11:46:00 -0500 (EST)
Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 04:44:19 -0500 (EST)
> > Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> >
> > > I just had a quick IRC chat with DNF maintainer and he said we
> > > still wants to switch to py3 for F22.
> >
> > Lov
- Original Message -
> On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 04:44:19 -0500 (EST)
> Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
>
> > I just had a quick IRC chat with DNF maintainer and he said we still
> > wants to switch to py3 for F22.
>
> Lovely.
>
> Perhaps we could get the dnf folks, anaconda, qa and fesco all together
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 04:44:19 -0500 (EST)
Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> I just had a quick IRC chat with DNF maintainer and he said we still
> wants to switch to py3 for F22.
Lovely.
Perhaps we could get the dnf folks, anaconda, qa and fesco all together
in one place to discuss this?
> > We will no
On Fri, 2015-01-30 at 04:44 -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > On Thu, 29 Jan 2015 09:39:28 -0500 (EST)
> > Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> > > So if more minimal is minimal buildroot, then we can achieve that,
> > > since it only has python-libs because of gdb and gdb ca
- Original Message -
> On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 08:56 -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> > I'm regularly talking to some of Anaconda devs (mostly Vrata
> > Podzimek) and they still think this is doable *without* introducing
> > high number of regressions, that would be impossible to fix before
>
- Original Message -
> On Thu, 29 Jan 2015 09:39:28 -0500 (EST)
> Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
>
> > Not sure about it being the default, but we've been testing it in
> > DevAssistant for dependency installation on Python 3 and never
> > encountered any problems. I was also contacted by dnf mai
- Original Message -
> On 29 January 2015 at 07:39, Bohuslav Kabrda < bkab...@redhat.com > wrote:
> > - Original Message -
>
> > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda < bkab...@redhat.com >
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > - Original Message -
>
> > > >> On Thu, Jan
On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 08:56 -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> I'm regularly talking to some of Anaconda devs (mostly Vrata
> Podzimek) and they still think this is doable *without* introducing
> high number of regressions, that would be impossible to fix before
> F22 final.
That doesn't seem to b
On Thu, 29 Jan 2015 09:39:28 -0500 (EST)
Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> Not sure about it being the default, but we've been testing it in
> DevAssistant for dependency installation on Python 3 and never
> encountered any problems. I was also contacted by dnf maintainer with
> a question on how to switc
On 29 January 2015 at 07:39, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda
> wrote:
> > > - Original Message -
> > >> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Miloslav Trmač
> wrote:
> > >> > (Speaking only for myself, not for all of
- Original Message -
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> >> > (Speaking only for myself, not for all of FESCo; hoping others will
> >> > chime
> >> > in.)
> >> >> - What if
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>> > (Speaking only for myself, not for all of FESCo; hoping others will chime
>> > in.)
>> >> - What if Anaconda does make it? :)
>> > I don’t know.
>>
- Original Message -
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > (Speaking only for myself, not for all of FESCo; hoping others will chime
> > in.)
> >> - What if Anaconda does make it? :)
> > I don’t know.
>
> I'm skeptical that will happen. Even if it does, that alone
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 08:06:04AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > (Speaking only for myself, not for all of FESCo; hoping others will chime
> > in.)
> >> - What if Anaconda does make it? :)
> > I don’t know.
>
> I'm skeptical that will happe
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 05:28:37AM -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 11:09:08AM -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> > > Some general notes:
> > > If your package depends on Python because of a Python script that has
> > > /usr/bin/python in hashban
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> (Speaking only for myself, not for all of FESCo; hoping others will chime in.)
>> - What if Anaconda does make it? :)
> I don’t know.
I'm skeptical that will happen. Even if it does, that alone is likely
not enough to claim python3 by defa
(Speaking only for myself, not for all of FESCo; hoping others will chime in.)
> - What if Anaconda does make it? :)
I don’t know.
> - What is "enough"? It's possible that two or three packages may be still
> unported even in F23 (and as for server livecd in F23, I think there will be
> few more).
- Original Message -
> > > So, at today's FESCo meeting there was a good deal of discussion about
> > > python as default:
> > > http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-01-28/fesco.2015-01-28-18.02.log.html#l-41
> > >
> > > in which we agreed defer this to F23, file bugs again
> > So, at today's FESCo meeting there was a good deal of discussion about
> > python as default:
> > http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-01-28/fesco.2015-01-28-18.02.log.html#l-41
> >
> > in which we agreed defer this to F23, file bugs against rawhide after
> > branch (+6,0,0)
>
- Original Message -
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 11:09:08AM -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> > Some general notes:
> > If your package depends on Python because of a Python script that has
> > /usr/bin/python in hashbang, you need to change this to /usr/bin/python3.
> > All "Requires" and "Bui
- Original Message -
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 11:09:08 -0500 (EST)
> Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I just filed 2 bugs [A], [B] for the Python 3 switch [C] and I
> > realized that I should probably follow the mass bug filing policy. As
> > I've said previously, we've already had both
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 11:09:08AM -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> Some general notes:
> If your package depends on Python because of a Python script that has
> /usr/bin/python in hashbang, you need to change this to /usr/bin/python3. All
> "Requires" and "BuildRequires" on Python extension modul
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 11:09:08 -0500 (EST)
Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> Hi,
> I just filed 2 bugs [A], [B] for the Python 3 switch [C] and I
> realized that I should probably follow the mass bug filing policy. As
> I've said previously, we've already had both Python 2 and Python 3 on
> LiveCDs for few
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Dan Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 11:09 -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
Hi,
I just filed 2 bugs [A], [B] for the Python 3 switch [C] and I
realized that I should probably follow the mass bug filing policy.
As I've said previously, we've already had both Python 2 and Py
On 01/28/2015 06:08 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 11:09 -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
Hi,
I just filed 2 bugs [A], [B] for the Python 3 switch [C] and I realized that I
should probably follow the mass bug filing policy.
As I've said previously, we've already had both Python 2 an
On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 11:09 -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> Hi,
> I just filed 2 bugs [A], [B] for the Python 3 switch [C] and I realized that
> I should probably follow the mass bug filing policy.
> As I've said previously, we've already had both Python 2 and Python 3 on
> LiveCDs for few releas
Hi,
I just filed 2 bugs [A], [B] for the Python 3 switch [C] and I realized that I
should probably follow the mass bug filing policy.
As I've said previously, we've already had both Python 2 and Python 3 on
LiveCDs for few releases, so it makes sense to move as much as possible to
Python 3. My i
27 matches
Mail list logo
