Ian McInerney kirjoitti 16.1.2021 klo 22.06:
I noticed due to an upstream bug report for a project I am on that the Fedora
packaging guidelines still say that GUI applications should install their files
as appdata.xml files and not metainfo.xml files
(https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/pack
I noticed due to an upstream bug report for a project I am on that the Fedora
packaging guidelines still say that GUI applications should install their files
as appdata.xml files and not metainfo.xml files
(https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/AppData/). The
upstream spec f
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 02:18:32PM +0100, Michal Ruprich wrote:
> On 3/20/19 2:06 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 9:00 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> >> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 10:44:53AM +0100, Michal Ruprich wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I am preparing FRR so that i
On 3/20/19 2:06 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 9:00 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 10:44:53AM +0100, Michal Ruprich wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am preparing FRR so that it could be added to Fedora and since there
>>> are a lot of experienced packag
On 3/20/19 1:58 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 10:44:53AM +0100, Michal Ruprich wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am preparing FRR so that it could be added to Fedora and since there
>> are a lot of experienced packagers here, I would like to ask for an
>> advice. FRR is a fo
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 9:00 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 10:44:53AM +0100, Michal Ruprich wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am preparing FRR so that it could be added to Fedora and since there
> > are a lot of experienced packagers here, I would like to ask for an
> >
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 10:44:53AM +0100, Michal Ruprich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am preparing FRR so that it could be added to Fedora and since there
> are a lot of experienced packagers here, I would like to ask for an
> advice. FRR is a fork of quagga and it provides a couple of routing
> daemons(bgp
Hi,
I am preparing FRR so that it could be added to Fedora and since there
are a lot of experienced packagers here, I would like to ask for an
advice. FRR is a fork of quagga and it provides a couple of routing
daemons(bgp, isis, odpf, rip, eigrp etc.). Originally in quagga, each
daemon had its ow
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Anshu Prateek wrote:
> hi,
>
> I am working on packaging an upstream (aerospike) which presently puts some
> of its file in /opt/aerospike.
>
> The two main folders in use (by upstream) are
>
> /opt/aerospike/sys/udf/lua - This has the user defined lua functions
>
On 01/04/2015 10:34 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 3:01 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 01/04/2015 07:41 AM, Anshu Prateek wrote:
hi,
I am working on packaging an upstream (aerospike) which presently puts
some of its file in /opt/aerospike.
The two main folders in use (
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 3:01 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 01/04/2015 07:41 AM, Anshu Prateek wrote:
>>
>> hi,
>>
>> I am working on packaging an upstream (aerospike) which presently puts
>> some of its file in /opt/aerospike.
>>
>> The two main folders in use (by upstream) are
>>
>> /opt/aerosp
On 01/04/2015 07:41 AM, Anshu Prateek wrote:
hi,
I am working on packaging an upstream (aerospike) which presently puts
some of its file in /opt/aerospike.
The two main folders in use (by upstream) are
/opt/aerospike/sys/udf/lua - This has the user defined lua functions
shipped with the pac
Thanks echevemaster.
Created https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/487
On Sun Jan 04 2015 at 12:51:16 PM Eduardo Javier Echeverria Alvarado <
echevemas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Open a ticket in FPC, you can may only use directories in the
> /opt/fedora, however fpc can help you decide whether it's a
Open a ticket in FPC, you can may only use directories in the
/opt/fedora, however fpc can help you decide whether it's a valid use
of /opt and what subdirectory should be allocated for your use [1][2]
[1]
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Limited_usage_of_.2Fopt.2C_.2Fetc.2Fopt.
hi,
I am working on packaging an upstream (aerospike) which presently puts
some of its file in /opt/aerospike.
The two main folders in use (by upstream) are
/opt/aerospike/sys/udf/lua - This has the user defined lua functions
shipped with the package.
/opt/aerospike/usr/udf/ - This will have
On 11/11/2013 09:50 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
[I sent this to the users list a little while ago, but got no takers.
Hopefully I'll have better luck here.]
I'd like to ensure core files go to a local partition rather than the
default location ($HOME), which is network-mounted in my case.
Googli
在 2013-11-11一的 22:17 -0500，Braden McDaniel写道：
> On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 20:00 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 15:50 -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> > >
> > > That page suggests that when abrt is in use, core files would be
> > > generated in the location set by abrt, which
On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 22:17 -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> Given that this is the case, are you saying that I shouldn't be
> getting
> core files in $HOME at all?
I'm not an ABRT developer, sorry, just wanted to point you to that
setting. (I haven't changed it either. My experience is that dumps a
On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 20:00 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 15:50 -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> >
> > That page suggests that when abrt is in use, core files would be
> > generated in the location set by abrt, which defaults
> > to /var/spool/abrt. However, I have abrtd
On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 15:50 -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote:
>
> That page suggests that when abrt is in use, core files would be
> generated in the location set by abrt, which defaults
> to /var/spool/abrt. However, I have abrtd running and I'm definitely
> getting core files in $HOME. Does abrt j
[I sent this to the users list a little while ago, but got no takers.
Hopefully I'll have better luck here.]
I'd like to ensure core files go to a local partition rather than the
default location ($HOME), which is network-mounted in my case.
Googling a bit, I found this:
https://access.r
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 07:05:52PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Shouldn't they be in /usr/share/systemd?
The helper binaries? No. The unit files? They need to be in / rather
than /usr, which obviously isn't a problem for Fedora but would be on
some other distributions.
--
Matthew Garrett |
On 12/20/2012 03:30 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:02:22PM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
The effect of this is:
FPC will write into the Guidelines (probably where libexec is mentioned
since that's where the note about being able to use %{_libdir} as an
alternative to %
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 21:11 -0500, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 19:16 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 19:04 -0500, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> > > I work on another open-source project that is considering using
> > > pkg-config, and we are trying to establ
On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 20:22 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 February 2010, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 19:16 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 19:04 -0500, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> > > > I work on another open-source project that is consi
On Wednesday 03 February 2010, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 19:16 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 19:04 -0500, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> > > I work on another open-source project that is considering using
> > > pkg-config, and we are trying to establish st
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 19:16 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 19:04 -0500, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> > I work on another open-source project that is considering using
> > pkg-config, and we are trying to establish standards. I found the
> > guidelines for how to package .pc fi
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 19:04 -0500, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> I work on another open-source project that is considering using
> pkg-config, and we are trying to establish standards. I found the
> guidelines for how to package .pc files in Fedora (and EPEL), but I'm
> curious if there are Fedora or
I work on another open-source project that is considering using
pkg-config, and we are trying to establish standards. I found the
guidelines for how to package .pc files in Fedora (and EPEL), but I'm
curious if there are Fedora or Red Hat standards for the location where
the files are placed when
29 matches
Mail list logo
