Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-09-01 x86_64

2010-09-07 Thread Matt Domsch
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 02:40:37AM +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote: > Matt Domsch wrote, at 09/07/2010 11:24 AM +9:00: > > Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64 > > using rawhide from 2010-09-01 > > > > Full rebuild of all packages. Each failed package was retried two > > additional time

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-09-01 x86_64

2010-09-07 Thread Björn Persson
Mamoru Tasaka wrote: > Would you clarify if this build results are for rawhide (i.e. F-15) > tree or for F-14 tree? It looks like F-14 to me. Björn Persson signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedo

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-09-01 x86_64

2010-09-07 Thread Björn Persson
Matt Domsch wrote: > rombobeorn: PragmARC,mine_detector Those fail because of this GCC bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613407 I have a workaround in updates-testing, but the actual bug looks like it will last long. Björn Persson signature.asc Description: This is a digitally

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-09-01 x86_64

2010-09-07 Thread Mamoru Tasaka
Matt Domsch wrote, at 09/07/2010 11:24 AM +9:00: > Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64 > using rawhide from 2010-09-01 > > Full rebuild of all packages. Each failed package was retried two > additional times. Those listed below have failed at least three > attempts to build. > >

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-09-01 x86_64

2010-09-07 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 09/06/2010 08:24 PM, Matt Domsch wrote: > Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64 > using rawhide from 2010-09-01 > > Full rebuild of all packages. Each failed package was retried two > additional times. Those listed below have failed at least three > attempts to build. > > Sorry

Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-09-01 x86_64

2010-09-06 Thread Matt Domsch
Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64 using rawhide from 2010-09-01 Full rebuild of all packages. Each failed package was retried two additional times. Those listed below have failed at least three attempts to build. Sorry I can't mail to everyone individually this round, we've g