Am Donnerstag, den 03.06.2010, 09:42 -0500 schrieb Matt Domsch:
> julian: diveintopython,sap
I have already fixed sap, but I'm not able to do anything about
diveintopython. The build process simply is too old to work with newer
versions of the required libraries, and already worked only with patch
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 10:24:27PM -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64
> > using rawhide from 2010-06-01
> >
> [cut]
>
> Question 1:
> Suppose package A fails to build from source due to a bug in
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Matt Domsch wrote:
> Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64
> using rawhide from 2010-06-01
>
[cut]
Question 1:
Suppose package A fails to build from source due to a bug in package B
that is listed in package A's BuildRequires. Now that package B gets
Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
> I tried to add
> ---
> sed -i.nostatic \
> -e 's|--static||g' m4/qt.m4
> ---
> and this seems to make build succeed (I just also tried the same fix for
> rcsslogplayer and
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 08:57:06AM +0200, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
> >
> > It also doesn't report any failing packages that have subsequently
> > been built and published in koji's rawhide since 06-01. ??That should
> > cut down on the "but I just
/*Mamoru Tasaka */ wrote on 06/04/2010
12:00:50 PM +0450:
Hedayat Vatankhah wrote, at 06/04/2010 03:07 PM +9:00:
Hi,
My packages (rcsslogplayer and rcssmonitor) are being failed because of the
lack of Qt dependencies (QtNetwork requires ssl and crypto libraries from
openssl-devel package
Hedayat Vatankhah wrote, at 06/04/2010 03:07 PM +9:00:
> Hi,
> My packages (rcsslogplayer and rcssmonitor) are being failed because of the
> lack of Qt dependencies (QtNetwork requires ssl and crypto libraries from
> openssl-devel package, and gobject-2.0 from glib2-devel). As these packages
> a
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
>
> It also doesn't report any failing packages that have subsequently
> been built and published in koji's rawhide since 06-01. That should
> cut down on the "but I just fixed that!" responses from now on.
One question. Is committing the fix i
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 09:42:04AM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
> Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64
> using rawhide from 2010-06-01
>
> This run continues from the previous run, rebuilding those packages
> that failed during the earlier run, or that changed between 2010-05-27
> and
On 3 June 2010 21:29, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
> On 3 June 2010 20:12, Matt Domsch wrote:
>> Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64
>> using rawhide from 2010-06-01
>>
>
> Small enhancement request for your scripts: I have two packages in
> list (one maintainer and another co-maintainer)
On 3 June 2010 20:12, Matt Domsch wrote:
> Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64
> using rawhide from 2010-06-01
>
Small enhancement request for your scripts: I have two packages in
list (one maintainer and another co-maintainer) and both are mentioned
at the bottom, but I get mail
Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64
using rawhide from 2010-06-01
This run continues from the previous run, rebuilding those packages
that failed during the earlier run, or that changed between 2010-05-27
and 06-01. This picks up a few fixes:
* a newer pkgconfig that doesn't segf
12 matches
Mail list logo
