Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 06:20 -0400, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>> Btw. do we have/is anybody working on SB support for multiboot medias?
>> The main idea of having SB is specially for these medias distributed on
>> events.
>
> Oh, right. So I need to add BIOS/EFI/SB testing to
On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 06:20 -0400, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > On 09/13/2012 09:08 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> > > I haven't actually downloaded and looked at one of these multi-arch
> > > images, but one thing that might be nice (and not too much of a
> > > load on
> > >
On 09/17/2012 06:20 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> On 09/13/2012 09:08 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
>>> I haven't actually downloaded and looked at one of these multi-arch
>>> images, but one thing that might be nice (and not too much of a
>>> load on
>>> mirrors) would be t
- Original Message -
> On 09/13/2012 09:08 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> > I haven't actually downloaded and looked at one of these multi-arch
> > images, but one thing that might be nice (and not too much of a
> > load on
> > mirrors) would be to make a multi-arch/multi-image netinst/rescue
> >
On 2012-09-14 7:20, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
We discussed it in FAmSCo and I also spoke with Fedora QA guys.
They're
willing to do the testing. It's not particularly difficult. What they
would appreciate is building those ISOs for RC so that they can test
it
before the final release. So far, the
We discussed it in FAmSCo and I also spoke with Fedora QA guys. They're
willing to do the testing. It's not particularly difficult. What they
would appreciate is building those ISOs for RC so that they can test it
before the final release. So far, the multi-arch ISOs have been built
only for the fi
On 09/13/2012 09:08 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> I haven't actually downloaded and looked at one of these multi-arch
> images, but one thing that might be nice (and not too much of a load on
> mirrors) would be to make a multi-arch/multi-image netinst/rescue image.
> How do you create the multi-arch im
Once upon a time, Dennis Gilmore said:
> when I was first asked to create the
> multi images it was under the understanding that it would be for use at
> fedora events by ambassadors only. There is no way that Im going to put
> them on the main mirror without consulting with the people that run th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:59:16 -0700 (PDT)
Henrique Junior wrote:
> Fedora multi-arch [1] is a
> good idea that is not receiving the emphasis it should. In fact, most
> people do not even know it exists and I wonder why not give a litt
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:59:16 -0700 (PDT)
> Henrique Junior wrote:
>
>> Fedora multi-arch [1] is a
>> good idea that is not receiving the emphasis it should. In fact, most
>> people do not even know it exists and I w
I know that the guys in QA have a lot of work to do already, but is there
any chance of multi-arch to receive more attention in the near future?
2012/9/12 Álvaro Castillo
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
>> These were originally for ambassadors only to use at events.
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> These were originally for ambassadors only to use at events.
>
> I have no objection to making them more known, however, I think they
> should be tested and produced in the same way other Fedora images are.
>
> In the f17 cycle they were not
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:59:16 -0700 (PDT)
Henrique Junior wrote:
> Fedora multi-arch [1] is a
> good idea that is not receiving the emphasis it should. In fact, most
> people do not even know it exists and I wonder why not give a little
> more emphasis on this download option. mayb
Fedora multi-arch [1] is a
good idea that is not receiving the emphasis it should. In fact, most
people do not even know it exists and I wonder why not give a little
more emphasis on this download option. maybe adding one more entry in "Formats"
when downloading[2] .
What do you th
14 matches
Mail list logo
